substantial claims

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantial claims" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to significant or considerable assertions or allegations, often in legal, academic, or formal contexts. Example: "The company faced substantial claims regarding the safety of its products, leading to an extensive investigation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

17 human-written examples

"They need to make substantial claims".

The New York Times

Hilal, of course, had three substantial claims for penalties.

The Guardian - Sport

But even at its most mean-spirited, the book makes a few stingingly substantial claims.

The New York Times - Books

His defence: He has rented the studio flat close to Westminster for 20 years and before the claim had submitted "no substantial claims for maintenance".

The Guardian

Kent Scheidegger, the legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, a group in Sacramento that favors the death penalty, said substantial claims of innocence in such appeals remained rare.

The New York Times

Expecting "very substantial" claims from about 140,000 aggrieved holidaymakers, the administrators warned that pooled compensation was unlikely to be more than 1%-2% per claimant – potentially less than £10.

The Guardian - Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

"Most people will never have a substantial claim in their life.

The New York Times

It was the first time the government had made a substantial claim of deaths.

The New York Times

Pinochet's most substantial claim to being a good leader is that he oversaw the Chilean economic miracle.

The New Yorker

Collins says the Braziers' total claim is far larger than the £25,000 uninsured loss and would include a substantial claim for loss of earnings.

The Guardian - Money

In his Poe dissent, Harlan wrote that the plaintiffs' "most substantial claim . . . is their right to enjoy the privacy of their marital relations".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "substantial claims", ensure that the context provides evidence or indications that the claims are indeed significant. Avoid using it for trivial matters.

Common error

Avoid using "substantial claims" when the assertions are clearly weak or unsupported. Overusing the phrase can undermine its impact and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantial claims" primarily functions as a noun phrase, where "substantial" modifies the noun "claims". It describes assertions or allegations that are significant in amount, size, or importance, as seen in examples from Ludwig, where the phrase appears in contexts such as legal disputes and insurance matters.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

53%

Science

29%

Formal & Business

18%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "substantial claims" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to denote significant assertions or allegations. As verified by Ludwig AI, it appears commonly in formal contexts like news, science, and business. Alternatives such as "significant allegations" or "considerable assertions" can be used to vary the wording, while maintaining the core meaning. When using this phrase, ensure the context warrants the emphasis on the claim's importance to maintain credibility. The expression presents itself as commonly used and perfectly correct.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant allegations

Replaces "claims" with "allegations", implying a lack of proof but strong assertion.

considerable assertions

Substitutes both words to provide a more neutral tone, suitable for formal contexts.

major contentions

Uses "contentions" to suggest a point of disagreement or debate is being made.

serious accusations

Emphasizes the gravity of the claims, implying potential wrongdoing.

extensive demands

Changes the noun to "demands", focusing on what is being asked or required.

weighty arguments

Emphasizes the importance and impact of the arguments made.

notable contentions

Highlights the noteworthiness or prominence of the disputed points.

impactful declarations

Focuses on the strong effect or influence of the statements.

fundamental assertions

Indicates that the claims are basic or foundational to a larger argument.

considerable lawsuits

Shifts the context to legal actions, implying formal claims for damages or redress.

FAQs

How can I use "substantial claims" in a sentence?

You can use "substantial claims" to describe significant assertions. For example, "The investigation revealed "substantial claims" of fraud against the company".

What is a good alternative to "substantial claims"?

Alternatives include "significant allegations", "considerable assertions", or "major contentions", depending on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "substantial claims"?

It is appropriate when referring to claims that are considerable in amount, size, or importance, often in legal, financial, or academic contexts.

What's the difference between "substantial claims" and "minor claims"?

"Substantial claims" refers to significant or considerable assertions, while "minor claims" refers to smaller, less important assertions. The distinction lies in the magnitude and impact of the claims.