subsequently triumphed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "subsequently triumphed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something achieved victory or success after a previous event or series of events. Example: "After facing numerous challenges, the team subsequently triumphed in the championship game."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

(She subsequently triumphed as a cabaret star whose persona combined willfulness and regret).

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

She triumphed.

Independent

What if she triumphed?

The New York Times

And they triumphed.

Independent

Total blackness triumphed a year later.

The New York Times - Arts

Those women almost triumphed.

The Guardian

Who'd triumphed?

The New Yorker

Unionism will have triumphed.

The Economist

(All three triumphed).

The New York Times - Books

Modigliani triumphed in August.

The New Yorker

Violence triumphed.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "subsequently triumphed" to clearly indicate a sequence of events where an initial situation is followed by a successful outcome. This phrase adds a sense of narrative progression to your writing.

Common error

While "subsequently triumphed" is grammatically correct, avoid overusing formal adverbs like "subsequently" in informal contexts. Consider simpler alternatives like "then won" or "later succeeded" for a more natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "subsequently triumphed" functions as an adverbial modifier followed by a verb, indicating that an action of triumph or victory occurred after a preceding event. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "subsequently triumphed" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression, primarily found in News & Media contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it effectively narrates a sequence of events where a victory occurs after a specific situation or time. While versatile, it's important to consider simpler alternatives like "later prevailed" in informal settings to maintain a natural tone. In essence, "subsequently triumphed" serves as a clear and effective way to emphasize a temporal relationship between preceding events and a final successful outcome.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

later prevailed

Replaces "triumphed" with "prevailed", focusing on overcoming challenges.

eventually succeeded

Uses "succeeded" to emphasize the achievement of a goal after some time.

thereafter was victorious

More formal, replacing "subsequently" with "thereafter" and "triumphed" with "was victorious".

then achieved victory

Replaces "subsequently" with "then" for a simpler construction and "triumphed" with "achieved victory".

afterwards, was triumphant

Swaps "subsequently" with "afterwards" and maintains a formal tone using "triumphant".

in the end, won

Simple and direct, emphasizing the final winning outcome.

ultimately came out on top

Uses the idiom "came out on top" to suggest overcoming competition.

followed by success

More concise, focusing on the sequence of events leading to success.

progressed to win

Emphasizes the progress leading to the win.

proceeded to dominate

Implies a strong and forceful victory.

FAQs

How can I use "subsequently triumphed" in a sentence?

Use "subsequently triumphed" to show that a victory or success occurred after a specific event or series of events. For example, "After facing numerous challenges, the team "subsequently triumphed" in the championship game."

What are some alternatives to "subsequently triumphed"?

You can use alternatives like "later prevailed", "eventually succeeded", or "then achieved victory" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "subsequently triumph"?

No, "subsequently" is an adverb and needs to be followed by a verb in the past tense, like ""subsequently triumphed"". "Subsequent triumph" is correct if you want to use "triumph" as a noun.

What is the difference between "subsequently triumphed" and "immediately triumphed"?

"Subsequently triumphed" indicates a victory that followed some time after an event, while "immediately triumphed" suggests the victory occurred directly after the event, without delay.