subsequent review

USAGE SUMMARY

"subsequent review" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to refer to an analysis that happens after something has already been examined. For example, "The paper was accepted after a subsequent review by a panel of experts."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Although grants were restored after governance reforms, each subsequent review has raised worrying queries.

The Guardian

However, a subsequent review allowed Huawei staff to stay in place, with greater UK oversight.

The Guardian

A subsequent review of the transcript would show his tacit approval.

The New York Times

Indeed, Mr. Lay said, a subsequent review by independent lawyers and accountants, which found serious flaws in the structures, took three months to conclude.

The New York Times

Overtaxed to complete the international review and a subsequent review of terrorist financing, regulators notified Riggs that they would return in June for a closer look.

The New York Times

A subsequent review by Devon and Cornwall Police revealed that potential suspects were not properly investigated by Surrey Police.

Independent

In a subsequent review, Frances Yates, the great intellectual historian, attempted to defend the purported occult origins of the game.

The New York Times

The suspensions and resignations came as a "devastating" government report, criticising the authority's handling of the case, and subsequent review, was released.

Independent

But a subsequent review indicated that the source could have been any one of dozens of contracting companies or literally thousands of individuals.

The Economist

But after a subsequent review of the same seven studies, the United States Preventive Services Task Force, a panel of experts who set government policy, reached the opposite conclusion.

The New York Times - Science

A subsequent review of the riot, which destroyed much of the detention centre, criticised the Department of Immigration and major service providers for a "lack of decisive operational leadership".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "subsequent review" when you want to emphasize that an evaluation or analysis occurs after a specific event or initial assessment.

Common error

Avoid using "subsequent review" repeatedly within a short passage. If you need to refer to multiple follow-up evaluations, consider using synonyms like "follow-up assessment" or "later analysis" to maintain clarity and prevent redundancy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "subsequent review" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It typically acts as the subject or object of a sentence, denoting an evaluation or examination that occurs after an initial event or assessment. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a common and acceptable phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "subsequent review" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase indicating an evaluation that occurs after an initial event. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's well-regarded in written English. Its usage spans various contexts, including news, science, and formal business settings, with a neutral to formal register. To enhance clarity, consider alternatives like "follow-up assessment" or "later evaluation", especially when avoiding repetition. By understanding its function and communicative purpose, you can effectively use "subsequent review" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Subsequent assessment

Replaces "review" with the synonym "assessment", maintaining the meaning while using a different term.

Subsequent examination

Substitutes "review" with "examination", focusing on a more detailed or investigative aspect.

Later review

Simplifies the phrase using "later" instead of "subsequent", maintaining the temporal sequence.

Subsequent reexamination

Adds emphasis on the act of examining again, suggesting a deeper or more critical look.

Follow-up review

Highlights that the review is a direct consequence or continuation of a previous action or event.

Successive review

Indicates a series of reviews, one after the other, implying a repetitive nature not necessarily present in the original phrase.

Next review

Specifies that the review is the immediate follow-up, suggesting a more structured or planned sequence.

Subsequent reappraisal

Implies a re-evaluation or reconsideration, often suggesting a change in perspective or judgment.

Future review

Emphasizes the prospective nature of the review, indicating it will happen at some point.

Eventual review

Highlights the finality or eventual occurrence of the review, shifting the focus from sequence to outcome.

FAQs

How to use "subsequent review" in a sentence?

You can use "subsequent review" to indicate a later evaluation, such as: "The committee requested a "follow-up review" of the project's progress." or "A "later assessment" determined the initial findings were inaccurate."

What can I say instead of "subsequent review"?

You can use alternatives like "follow-up assessment", "later evaluation", or "subsequent assessment" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "subsequent review" or "subsequent preview"?

"Subsequent review" is used to describe an examination or analysis that happens after something. "Preview" means to view beforehand, so "subsequent preview" doesn't make logical sense. Use "subsequent review" if you mean an evaluation that comes after an initial action.

What's the difference between "subsequent review" and "prior review"?

"Subsequent review" refers to a review that takes place at a later time or after something else has happened. In contrast, "prior review" refers to a review that occurs before something else. The terms are antonyms, indicating opposite temporal positions of the review.