submitted a patent application

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "submitted a patent application" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the act of formally applying for a patent to protect an invention or idea. Example: "After months of research and development, the inventor submitted a patent application to secure the rights to their innovative technology."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

(He submitted a patent application this week).

The New York Times

In March it submitted a patent application for payments by selfies.

The Guardian

The Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research has submitted a patent application on LNA-based template switching.

Nature

J.D.K, C.M.D., and R.A.L. have submitted a patent application covering aspects of this technology.

Nature

Apple has submitted a patent application for a cellphone payment system.

The New York Times - Tech

With this in mind, IBM has submitted a patent application that would turn the virtual keyboard's weakness its non-physicality into anon-physicality into

MIT Technology Review

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

Originally, however, he had agreed to submit a patent application jointly with Morton and to share in the profits.

The New York Times - Books

Under current rules, known as "first to file," patent rights go to whoever submits a patent application first.

MIT Technology Review

After you submit a patent application you'll need some working capital.

Science Magazine

It is assumed that the greater the number of lecturers involved in business plan projects, the greater the probability of submitting a patent application.

Triple Helix

By selecting a two-year embargo, therefore, you will have a total of three years (two-year embargo plus one-year window after publication) to submit a patent application.

Duke University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing intellectual property, use "submitted a patent application" to clearly indicate the formal act of applying for patent protection.

Common error

Avoid using informal verbs like "sent" or "gave" instead of "submitted" when discussing patent applications in formal or legal contexts. The verb "submitted" specifically conveys the formal process of presenting an application for official consideration.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "submitted a patent application" functions as a declarative statement describing the action of formally presenting a patent application. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. Examples show this phrase consistently reports actions in legal and technical contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

36%

Formal & Business

24%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "submitted a patent application" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to describe the formal act of applying for patent protection. Ludwig AI confirms this phrase is usable in written English. It's particularly prevalent in the fields of Science, News & Media and Formal & Business contexts. When writing, make sure that this phrase is preferred over slightly incorrect alternatives in legal or technical documentation. Alternative phrasing includes "filed a patent application" or "applied for a patent", varying the level of formality to precisely suit the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

filed a patent application

Uses the verb "filed" instead of "submitted", implying the official act of lodging the application with the patent office.

lodged a patent application

Replaces "submitted" with "lodged", conveying a more formal tone for the act of filing a patent.

applied for a patent

Simplifies the phrase by using the verb "applied", focusing on the action of seeking a patent.

made a patent application

Uses "made" instead of "submitted", focusing on the creation of the application itself.

put in a patent application

Replaces "submitted" with "put in", offering a more informal way to describe the action.

presented a patent application

Uses "presented" instead of "submitted", emphasizing the act of formally presenting the application for review.

handed in a patent application

Substitutes "submitted" with "handed in", suggesting a physical act of delivering the application.

forwarded a patent application

Replaces "submitted" with "forwarded", implying the application was sent to another party for processing.

tendered a patent application

Uses "tendered" instead of "submitted", providing a more formal alternative to describe the action of presenting the application.

registered a patent application

Substitutes "submitted" with "registered", highlighting the formal recording of the application.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "submitted a patent application" in a sentence?

You can use "submitted a patent application" to indicate that someone has formally applied for a patent. For example: "The inventor "submitted a patent application" for their new invention."

What are some alternatives to "submitted a patent application"?

Some alternatives include "filed a patent application", "applied for a patent", or "lodged a patent application". The best choice depends on the specific context and desired level of formality.

Which is correct, "submitted a patent application" or "sent a patent application"?

"Submitted a patent application" is more appropriate in formal and legal contexts, as it emphasizes the official act of presenting the application. "Sent a patent application" is less formal and might imply merely mailing the documents.

What's the difference between "submitted a patent application" and "having a patent"?

"Submitted a patent application" means the application process has started, but the patent hasn't been granted yet. "Having a patent" means the application was successful, and the inventor now has legal protection for their invention.