subject to stringent limitations

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "subject to stringent limitations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing conditions or restrictions that are strict or severe in nature. Example: "The use of this technology is subject to stringent limitations imposed by regulatory authorities."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Nuclear and chemical weapons are subject to stringent inspection regimes.

The Economist

Yet activists say refugees seeking asylum in the US are already subject to stringent security assessments.

The Guardian

Norway's government insists that oil exploration is subject to stringent health, safety and environmental requirements.

The Guardian

"Birthing pools in hospitals are subject to stringent infection-control procedures and monitoring," she said.

The Guardian

Thus, RAG activity is subject to stringent temporal and spatial regulation.

Advances in Immunology

They may be subject to stringent real-time requirements and often perform several processes in parallel.

Design Methods for Reactive Systems Yourdon, Statemate, and the UML

Wnt signalling is subject to stringent positive and negative regulation to promote proper development and homeostasis yet avoid aberrant growth.

Stanford University

School food is subject to stringent nutritional guidelines.

BBC

GETFs are transparent derivative instruments, subject to stringent regulations in terms of investment norms and valuations.

Financial Innovation

Consequently, the infringements of privacy rights are restricted, and subject to stringent accountability mechanisms.

SEP

But he said GCHQ's operations were subject to stringent legal checks and scrutiny.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "subject to stringent limitations", clearly specify what is being limited and the nature of those limitations to provide clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "subject to stringent limitations" when the limitations are actually quite flexible or minor. Ensure the adjective "stringent" accurately reflects the severity of the restrictions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "subject to stringent limitations" functions as a descriptor, indicating that something is under strict control or is heavily restricted. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and usable in written English. It denotes a state of being bound by firm rules or conditions.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "subject to stringent limitations" is grammatically correct and serves to describe a situation where something is heavily restricted by strict rules or conditions. While there are no exact examples in Ludwig's database, Ludwig AI validates its proper use. It is suitable for neutral to formal contexts, informing the audience about the presence of tight regulations and controls. Alternatives such as "bound by strict constraints" or "governed by rigid rules" can be used to convey similar meanings, with slight variations in emphasis. When using the phrase, ensure that the limitations are genuinely stringent to maintain accuracy and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

bound by strict constraints

This alternative emphasizes the binding nature of the restrictions.

governed by rigid rules

This phrase focuses on the governing aspect of the limitations, highlighting the inflexibility of the rules.

restricted by tight regulations

This alternative underscores the regulatory aspect and the tightness of the restrictions.

controlled by exacting standards

This option stresses the control exerted by the high standards that must be met.

circumscribed by firm boundaries

This alternative conveys the idea of being enclosed or limited by clearly defined and unyielding boundaries.

curtailed by rigorous guidelines

This option emphasizes the curtailing or reducing effect caused by the rigorous nature of the guidelines.

hampered by severe restrictions

This suggests that progress or action is being impeded by the severity of the restrictions.

under tight control

This is a more concise way of saying that something is very closely monitored and regulated.

liable to strict conditions

This indicates a state of being subject to or likely to experience strict conditions.

constrained by precise requirements

This highlights the limiting effect of requirements that are exact and detailed.

FAQs

How can I use "subject to stringent limitations" in a sentence?

You can use "subject to stringent limitations" to describe situations where strict rules or conditions apply, for example: "The use of this technology is "subject to stringent limitations" imposed by regulatory authorities."

What are some alternatives to "subject to stringent limitations"?

Alternatives include phrases like "bound by strict constraints", "governed by rigid rules", or "restricted by tight regulations", each emphasizing a slightly different aspect of the restrictions.

Is it better to say "subject to strict limitations" or "subject to stringent limitations"?

"Stringent" implies a higher degree of strictness and enforcement than "strict". Use ""subject to stringent limitations"" when you want to emphasize the severity and rigor of the limitations.

What does "stringent" mean in the context of "subject to stringent limitations"?

In this context, "stringent" means strict, precise, and exacting. It emphasizes that the limitations are enforced rigorously and must be adhered to precisely.