subject to challenge

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "subject to challenge" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something is open to dispute, questioning, or opposition. Example: "The decision made by the committee is subject to challenge by any member who disagrees."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Results should always be subject to challenge from experiment.

The Economist

The ballots were mailed late or subject to challenge, making the counting difficult, election officials say.

The New York Times

But some of her most sweeping conclusions are subject to challenge.

The New York Times

Such admission decisions might be hard to defend if subject to challenge in a legal setting.

The Guardian

Assessments of commercial property are subject to challenge until March 1.

The New York Times

But such assertions are unproven at best, and certainly subject to challenge based on the record.

The Washington Post

He said a state law might be subject to challenge on the grounds that it interfered with interstate commerce.

The New York Times

Under this argument, any Gore electors chosen under the revised deadline would be subject to challenge as improperly appointed.

The New York Times

However, all these changes were made unilaterally by the UK and are subject to challenge in the ECJ.

The Guardian - Opinion

For our government to retain its legitimacy, its conduct must always be subject to challenge in a court of law.

The New York Times

The credentials of any delegation of guaranteed losers, rejected by the state's swing independents, would be subject to challenge.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "subject to challenge" in legal or academic writing, ensure that you clearly state the grounds upon which something can be challenged. Providing context enhances clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "subject to challenge" in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler alternatives like "questionable" or "disputable" may be more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "subject to challenge" functions as a predicative adjective phrase, describing a noun or clause that is open to being questioned, disputed, or formally challenged. Ludwig confirms this usage with numerous examples across various domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Academia

27%

Science

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "subject to challenge" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression used to denote that something is open to dispute or contestation. Ludwig AI confirms its prevalence across diverse fields like news, academia, and science. It serves to introduce an element of uncertainty or conditionality, highlighting the potential for future questioning or legal action. While the phrase maintains a formal tone, simpler alternatives exist for informal contexts. When using "subject to challenge", it's beneficial to clearly specify the basis for potential challenges to ensure clarity and precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

challengeable

Directly relates to the possibility of a challenge, often in a legal or formal context.

open to dispute

Focuses on the disputable nature of something, highlighting potential disagreement.

liable to be contested

Emphasizes the possibility of a formal challenge or legal dispute.

disputable

Indicates that something can be reasonably questioned or argued against.

vulnerable to objection

Highlights the susceptibility of something to being opposed or questioned.

susceptible to questioning

Focuses on the possibility of being interrogated or doubted.

amenable to review

Suggests that something is open for re-evaluation or scrutiny.

up for debate

Indicates that something is a topic for discussion and argument.

contestable

Highlights that something can be disputed or argued against.

debatable

Suggests that something is not certain and can be argued from different viewpoints.

FAQs

How can I use "subject to challenge" in a sentence?

The phrase "subject to challenge" is used to indicate that a statement, decision, or finding is open to dispute or opposition. For example, "The election results are "subject to challenge" if irregularities are found".

What's a simpler way to say "subject to challenge"?

Alternatives to "subject to challenge" include "open to dispute", "liable to be contested", or simply "disputable", depending on the context.

Is it more appropriate to use "subject to challenge" or "challengeable"?

"Subject to challenge" is a phrase typically used to describe a condition or state, while "challengeable" is an adjective describing the quality of being able to be challenged. For instance, "The data is "subject to challenge"," versus "The data's accuracy is "challengeable"".

In what situations should I use "subject to challenge"?

Use "subject to challenge" in formal contexts such as legal, academic, or professional writing where you need to indicate that something is not definitive and can be questioned or opposed with valid reasons.