strong standards

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "strong standards" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to high levels of quality, performance, or expectations in various contexts, such as education, business, or manufacturing. Example: "Our organization is committed to maintaining strong standards in all our operations to ensure customer satisfaction."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

"I'm not against strong standards," Mr. Vann said.

The New York Times

They usually have strong standards of disclosure and transparency.

The New York Times

Enforcing strong standards for user identities and passwords means stealing credentials is that much harder.

Harvard Business Review

SOAP web-services chosen for W7-X are characterized by strong standards and readily available tools.

Fusion Engineering and Design

It also should set strong standards for voting machines, including a federal requirement for paper trails and audits.

The New York Times

"These states will keep their own strong standards in place and challenge the Trump administration's attacks," she said.

The Washington Post

"Without strong standards, we have no way of knowing whether the cash could end up in enemy hands," said Waxman.

The Washington Post

It is crucial that companies can trace back the palm oil they use back to the plantation and that those plantations meet strong standards, says Rahamwati of Greenpeace.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

EPA has every reason to adopt a strong standard.

Huffington Post

This season launches Player Safety off to a strong, standard-setting start.

Los Angeles Times

The US can set a strong standard for international emulation in terms of policy and practices for energy efficiency.

HuffPost

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In formal writing, support the need for "strong standards" with evidence or examples of the benefits they provide or the risks of lacking them.

Common error

Avoid simply calling for "strong standards" without specifying what those standards entail. Vague pronouncements lack actionable value and can be perceived as insincere or uninformed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "strong standards" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "strong" modifies the noun "standards". As stated by Ludwig AI, this is a correct and usable phrase. Examples from Ludwig illustrate its use in contexts such as advocating for stringent regulations and ensuring high quality.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

53%

Science

24%

Formal & Business

16%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "strong standards" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression for emphasizing the importance of high-quality benchmarks, regulations, or criteria. As Ludwig AI indicates, this is a usable and correct phrase. Its applications span across news, science, and business, advocating for excellence and accountability. To maximize clarity, specify the context in which these standards apply (e.g., environmental, safety). Avoid overgeneralization; instead, provide concrete details about what these "strong standards" entail to make your communication more impactful and sincere. Alternatives such as "high benchmarks", "stringent regulations", and "rigorous criteria" can offer nuanced meaning in different contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

high benchmarks

Emphasizes a specific level or target that is considered high or difficult to achieve, differing slightly in its focus on a particular point of reference rather than a general quality.

stringent regulations

Focuses specifically on rules and laws that are strictly enforced, highlighting the enforcement aspect more than the general concept of standards.

rigorous criteria

Highlights the thoroughness and strictness of the evaluation process involved in meeting the standards, emphasizing the judgment process.

exacting requirements

Stresses the demanding nature of the standards, indicating that they require precision and careful adherence, changing focus to the demands of those criteria.

strict guidelines

Similar to stringent regulations, but often applies to less formal contexts, such as internal policies or best practices, instead of enforced laws.

demanding specifications

Highlights the technical aspects of the standards, particularly in engineering or manufacturing contexts, making it suitable to describe measurable requirements.

robust policies

Focuses on the strength and effectiveness of the policies in achieving desired outcomes, emphasizing the impact of the implemented standards.

firm principles

Shifts the emphasis to the foundational beliefs or values upon which the standards are based, indicating a more moral or ethical grounding.

solid principles

Similar to "firm principles", but suggests a more reliable and dependable foundation for the standards, while maintaining more emphasis on values.

tough mandates

Indicates that the standards are compulsory and may be challenging to meet, highlighting the compulsory character of these standards.

FAQs

How can I use "strong standards" in a sentence?

You can use "strong standards" to advocate for higher levels of performance, quality, or regulation. For example: "The company implemented "strong standards" for data security to protect customer information."

What are some synonyms for "strong standards"?

Alternatives include "high benchmarks", "stringent regulations", or "rigorous criteria", depending on the specific context.

What's the difference between "strong standards" and "minimum requirements"?

"Strong standards" suggest a higher level of quality and performance, while "minimum requirements" indicate the lowest acceptable level. "Strong standards" aim for excellence, whereas "minimum requirements" aim for adequacy.

Why are "strong standards" important?

"Strong standards" ensure better outcomes, promote accountability, and foster trust. They help organizations and individuals achieve higher levels of success and maintain a positive reputation. They are also important to avoid "loose standards" and the problems that may cause.