strong methodology

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "strong methodology" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing research, analysis, or any systematic approach that is robust and well-structured. Example: "The study was well-received due to its strong methodology, which ensured reliable results."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

The methodological quality of studies varied considerably and none had consistently strong methodology across the majority of applied criteria.

BMC Public Health

The Post/ABC poll is a very good survey, with strong methodology and a strong track record.

The New York Times

Jeroen Douwes, a professor of epidemiology at Massey University in New Zealand who has published widely on asthma in children but was not involved in this work, cited the study's strong methodology.

The New York Times - Health

Simon MacMahon, global director of advisory services at Sustainalytics, says that many commissioning organizations fail to put in the time and energy necessary to produce informed results: "To be credible, rankings need a strong methodology, a tested research process that in most cases should include company dialogue, and a team of skilled analysts.

The Guardian

That desire to follow commercial goals first, standards second, was balanced out with the strong methodology from W3C.

TechCrunch

SAI method gives a strong methodology for designing solar collectors on the basis of utilization ratios and heat equations.

Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

Strong methodologies build confidence in research findings by providing evidence that HR practitioners can draw on to inform decision making (see Bainbridge, et al. 2016; Rynes & Bartunek, 2017).

Frontiers of Business Research in China

They revealed that poor implementation may reduce a programme's effectiveness and that strong methodologies to measure and analyze implementation should be developed.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Although some regulators have rejected this body of literature because of a lack of standardized protocols, reviews of these studies have indicated strong methodologies and stringent laboratory practices, often of higher quality than studies employing Good Laboratory Practices (Myers et al. 2009).

Environmental Health Perspectives

Our findings show that the nature of evidence was weighed differently by stakeholders; for instance, researchers preferred strong methodologies for policy evidence while policymakers looked at feasibility of implementation and also expected a broader set of evidence especially for innovations like SMC.

BMC International Health and Human Rights

Use of haplotypes for a particular gene or a broader assessment of serotonergic genes is mentioned as a stronger methodology.

Behavioral and Brain Functions

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing research, clearly define what makes the methodology "strong". Provide specific details about the design, data collection, and analysis techniques used.

Common error

Avoid simply claiming a "strong methodology" without providing evidence. Back up your claim with concrete examples of rigorous design, validated instruments, or robust analytical techniques.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "strong methodology" functions as a noun phrase, where "strong" acts as an adjective modifying the noun "methodology". It describes a characteristic or quality of a particular methodology. Ludwig's examples confirm its use in academic, scientific, and news contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

58%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "strong methodology" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe a robust and reliable approach to research, analysis, or systematic processes. As Ludwig AI points out, its usage is particularly prevalent in scientific, news, and business contexts. When using this phrase, be prepared to provide specific details and evidence to support your assertion of strength. Alternatives such as "robust methodology" or "rigorous methodology" can also be used to convey a similar meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

robust methodology

Emphasizes the resilience and reliability of the methodology.

rigorous methodology

Highlights the strictness and precision of the methodological approach.

sound methodology

Focuses on the validity and rationality of the methodology.

well-developed methodology

Stresses the completeness and maturity of the methodology.

validated methodology

Highlights the fact that the methodology has been tested and confirmed.

effective methodology

Focuses on how well the methodology achieves its intended results.

reliable methodology

Emphasizes the consistency and dependability of the methodology.

solid methodology

Focuses on the stability and firmness of the methodological approach.

thorough methodology

Highlights the detail-oriented aspect of the methodological approach.

comprehensive methodology

Stresses the breadth and inclusiveness of the methodology.

FAQs

How can I use "strong methodology" in a sentence?

You can use "strong methodology" to describe a research approach, a systematic process, or an analytical framework that is considered robust and reliable. For example, "The research findings were credible due to the study's "strong methodology"".

What can I say instead of "strong methodology"?

You can use alternatives like "robust methodology", "rigorous methodology", or "sound methodology" depending on the specific context and the aspect you want to emphasize.

What are the key characteristics of a "strong methodology" in research?

Key characteristics include a well-defined research design, appropriate sampling techniques, valid and reliable measurement instruments, rigorous data analysis procedures, and consideration of potential biases.

Is there a difference between "strong methodology" and "good methodology"?

"Strong methodology" implies a particularly robust and rigorous approach, while "good methodology" suggests a more general level of competence and adherence to established standards. "Strong methodology" highlights exceptional quality and reliability.