strong grounds for

USAGE SUMMARY

"strong grounds for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to describe a situation or belief that has been well-supported by evidence or argument. For example, "The evidence presented by the prosecution was strong grounds for conviction."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Strong grounds for in".

The Guardian

There are strong grounds for interest in such approaches.

The Washington Post

There are strong grounds for voiding those contracts and starting the bidding again.Would that be legal?

The Economist

"There are strong grounds for believing Mr Mahmood told me lies," Judge McCreath told the jury.

Independent

But I believe that there are many strong grounds for doubting that claim.

Independent

Freedom of information experts say there appear to be strong grounds for the legal challenges.

The Guardian

Chris Jackson, RES project manager, said: "We believe that RES has very strong grounds for appeal.

The Guardian

But there are strong grounds for supposing the heritability is not actually missing – it's non-existent.

The Guardian - Opinion

We have very strong grounds for believing these are Israeli intelligence agents".

The Guardian

If authentic, they would be very strong grounds for the granting of an appeal.

The Guardian

We consider they were strong grounds for challenging the approval in the first place".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "strong grounds for", ensure that the grounds you are referring to are clearly articulated and supported by verifiable evidence. This strengthens your argument and enhances credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "strong grounds for" when the evidence is weak or speculative. Overstating the strength can undermine your position if the audience perceives the grounds as flimsy or unsupported.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "strong grounds for" functions as a qualifier indicating that there are substantial reasons or evidence supporting a particular action, belief, or conclusion. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and conveys a well-supported position.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "strong grounds for" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to indicate substantial reasons or evidence supporting a claim or action. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is commonly employed across various contexts, including news, science, and formal writing. When using this phrase, ensure that the "grounds" are well-defined and supported by verifiable evidence to strengthen your argument. Remember to avoid overstating the strength of the grounds if the evidence is weak or speculative. Alternatives like "compelling reasons for" or "substantial basis for" can be used to add nuance to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

compelling reasons for

Replaces "grounds" with "reasons" and "strong" with "compelling" to emphasize the persuasiveness of the justification.

valid justification for

Substitutes "grounds" with "justification" and "strong" with "valid", highlighting the legitimacy of the reason.

substantial basis for

Replaces "grounds" with "basis" and "strong" with "substantial", emphasizing the solid foundation of the rationale.

significant cause for

Changes "grounds" to "cause" and "strong" to "significant", focusing on the importance of the reason.

legitimate rationale for

Replaces "grounds" with "rationale" and "strong" with "legitimate", stressing the lawfulness and correctness of the reason.

ample evidence for

Replaces "grounds" with "evidence" and "strong" with "ample", highlighting the abundance of proof supporting the claim.

sound foundation for

Substitutes "grounds" with "foundation" and "strong" with "sound", emphasizing the reliability and strength of the basis.

cogent case for

Changes "grounds" to "case" and "strong" to "cogent", focusing on the convincing nature of the argument.

sufficient basis for

Replaces "strong" with "sufficient", indicating that the reason is adequate.

adequate reason for

Emphasizes that the provided reason is enough or satisfactory.

FAQs

How can I use "strong grounds for" in a sentence?

You can use "strong grounds for" to indicate that there is a solid basis or justification for a particular action, belief, or conclusion. For example, "The new evidence provides "strong grounds for" reopening the case".

What are some alternatives to "strong grounds for"?

Alternatives include "compelling reasons for", "valid justification for", or "substantial basis for". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more appropriate to say "strong reasons for" or "strong grounds for"?

Both "strong reasons for" and "strong grounds for" are acceptable and often interchangeable. "Reasons" might be more commonly used in everyday conversation, while "grounds" can lend a slightly more formal or legalistic tone.

What constitutes "strong grounds" in a legal context?

In a legal context, "strong grounds" typically refers to evidence or arguments that are persuasive and sufficient to support a claim or legal action. It implies a high likelihood of success if the matter were to be pursued further.