strong evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

"strong evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to emphasize that you are providing proof that strongly supports a certain claim or assertion. For example: "The police had strong evidence to prove the suspect was guilty."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Strong evidence, then, for the grandmother hypothesis.

The Economist

Strong evidence exists for this claim.

The New York Times

I'm confident they have clear and strong evidence for it".

The Guardian

To many of Mr. Horowitz's supporters, that is strong evidence.

The New York Times - Arts

"It is being done intuitively, by looks, without strong evidence.

The New York Times - Science

I don't know of strong evidence for that claim".

The New Yorker

Uden said: "There is strong evidence of a wider benefit.

The Guardian - Business

Strong evidence, on the face of it, for Hamilton's theory.

The Economist

But there's very strong evidence that it will help.

The New York Times

That said, the story was grounded in very strong evidence.

The New York Times

"Certainly, hiring Keker and Peters is strong evidence of that".

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting "strong evidence", clearly articulate the evidence itself and explain how it supports your claim or argument. Avoid vague statements and provide specific details.

Common error

Avoid using "strong evidence" when the supporting information is preliminary, circumstantial, or based on limited data. Overstating the strength can undermine your credibility. Instead, use qualifying language such as "suggestive evidence" or "initial findings".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "strong evidence" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "strong" modifies the noun "evidence". It describes the quality or degree of proof supporting a particular claim or assertion. According to Ludwig, it is perfectly correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

41%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "strong evidence" is a grammatically correct and widely used phrase to denote compelling proof or support for a claim. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and common usage across various contexts. It appears most frequently in scientific and news-related domains, indicating its importance in factual and objective communication. When using "strong evidence", ensure that the evidence is indeed robust and clearly presented to maintain credibility. Consider using synonyms like "compelling evidence" or "substantial proof" for variety. Be mindful of overstating the strength of the evidence if it is not fully conclusive. Overall, "strong evidence" is a valuable tool for persuasive and informative writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

compelling evidence

Replaces "strong" with "compelling", emphasizing the persuasiveness of the evidence.

substantial proof

Substitutes both "strong" and "evidence" for synonyms with nearly identical semantic meaning.

convincing data

Replaces "evidence" with "data" and "strong" with "convincing" to suggest data that leads to belief.

definitive proof

Replaces "strong" with "definitive", implying a conclusive nature to the evidence.

solid grounds

Uses a metaphorical expression, replacing "evidence" with "grounds" and "strong" with "solid", suggesting a firm foundation.

irrefutable facts

Replaces "evidence" with "facts" and "strong" with "irrefutable", indicating facts that cannot be denied.

clear indications

Uses "indications" instead of "evidence", suggesting that something is pointed to clearly.

powerful indications

Substitutes "strong" with "powerful" while using indications as a replacement for "evidence".

cogent reasons

Replacing evidence with reasons and "strong" with "cogent".

ample support

Uses "support" instead of "evidence" and "ample" instead of "strong", conveying a plentiful amount of backing.

FAQs

How can I use "strong evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "strong evidence" to emphasize that there is significant proof supporting a particular claim. For example: "The scientist presented "strong evidence" that the new drug was effective."

What are some alternatives to saying "strong evidence"?

Alternatives include "compelling evidence", "substantial proof", or "convincing data", depending on the context.

What makes evidence considered "strong"?

Evidence is considered "strong" when it is reliable, directly relevant to the claim, and sufficient to persuade a reasonable person of the claim's validity. It often involves multiple lines of supporting information.

Is there a difference between "strong evidence" and "circumstantial evidence"?

"Strong evidence" directly supports a claim, while "circumstantial evidence" indirectly supports it by suggesting a series of related facts. Direct evidence is generally more persuasive than circumstantial evidence.