strict consequences for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "strict consequences for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that a certain action has a specific, unfavorable outcome. Example: People found guilty of theft face strict consequences for their actions.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The ban was supported by housing officials across the country, who say many of their residents want strict consequences for breaking the new rules.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

It should also be noted that event ruling bodies can set stricter consequences for team sports than permitted in Article 11.2, thus providing the event body with the discretion to decide on the level of punishment as it sees fit".

The Guardian - Sport

ATLANTA — Education Secretary Arne Duncan entered some of the most contentious debates in college sports on Thursday when, in a speech at the N.C.A.A. convention, he called for stricter consequences for college teams that do not graduate their athletes and said the N.B.A.'s age-minimum policy sets up young athletes for failure.

The New York Times - Sports

As teachers have stated, stricter consequences for cheating would be a step in the right direction.

Language Testing in Asia

What does seem clear is that they are less likely to experience strict consequences.

The New Yorker

Broken rules were followed by strict consequences rather than empty threats.

Huffington Post

However, when behavioural control becomes over-strict, the consequences for adolescents' emotional adjustment could be negative (Maccoby & Martin, 1983).

Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica

In lieu of a workable national education law, the Obama administration gave states waivers that allowed them to avoid NCLB's strictest consequences in exchange for agreeing to implement policies favored by the White House.

Huffington Post

And I do a lot of work on myself to keep myself in check, including meditating, writing exercises and strict promises and consequences for "bad behavior" in any of the above areas.

Huffington Post

Wondering aloud what to say "of the threat of a war which could strike the people of Iraq," he added: "War cannot be decided upon, even when it is a matter of ensuring the common good, except as the very last option, and in accordance with very strict conditions, without ignoring the consequences for the civilian population both during and after the military operations".

The New York Times

Finally, Part VIII of the Note explores the road ahead — if protection for commercial speech continues to become more stringent and is elevated to the strict scrutiny, what would be the consequences for food and drug law?

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing rules or policies, use "strict consequences for" to clearly communicate the seriousness of violations.

Common error

While "strict consequences for" is appropriate in formal and professional settings, avoid using it excessively in casual conversations, as it may sound overly severe or unnatural. Opt for alternatives like "serious results" or "big problems" in less formal scenarios.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "strict consequences for" functions as a noun phrase that identifies the ramifications of an action or decision. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and highlights that an action has a specific and unfavorable outcome. Examples show its use in describing policy and law.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

30%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "strict consequences for" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to denote the severe outcomes that follow certain actions. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's effective for emphasizing the seriousness of violating rules or policies. The phrase appears frequently in news, scientific, and academic contexts, indicating a neutral to formal register. When writing, ensure the tone matches the context, avoiding overuse in informal settings. Alternative phrases like "severe repercussions for" or "harsh penalties for" can provide variety while maintaining the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

severe repercussions for

This alternative highlights the severity of the outcomes, emphasizing the negative impact.

harsh penalties for

This alternative focuses on the punitive aspect, suggesting officially imposed punishments.

stringent ramifications for

This version uses more formal language and stresses the far-reaching effects.

firm accountability for

This alternative emphasizes responsibility and the certainty of being held to account.

rigorous enforcement of

This shifts the focus to the implementation of the rules and the strictness of their application.

heavy cost for

This alternative focuses on the price or sacrifice one pays for an action.

uncompromising discipline for

This option highlights the lack of leniency in the corrective measures applied.

inescapable outcomes of

This emphasizes that the consequences are unavoidable and directly linked to the action.

demanding conditions for

This describes very difficult or restrictive condition to be met.

unavoidable fallout from

This phrase points to the negative repercussions that stem directly from a certain event.

FAQs

How can I use "strict consequences for" in a sentence?

You can use "strict consequences for" to describe the results of violating a rule or law. For example, "There are "strict consequences for" drunk driving".

What are some alternatives to "strict consequences for"?

Alternatives to "strict consequences for" include "severe repercussions for", "harsh penalties for", or "stringent ramifications for".

When is it appropriate to use "strict consequences for"?

It is appropriate to use "strict consequences for" in formal contexts such as legal documents, policy statements, and professional communications where you want to emphasize the severity of violating rules or regulations.

What is the difference between "strict consequences for" and "consequences for"?

"Strict consequences for" implies that the results of an action are severe and rigorously enforced, whereas "consequences for" simply indicates that there will be some sort of outcome, without specifying its intensity or enforcement.