Ai Feedback
Exact(33)
But they are under the guidance of a state that many countries consider a strategic competitor, not an ally.
During his 2000 campaign, Mr. Bush described Beijing as a "strategic competitor" whose ambitions for global influence must be contained.
He made no reference to China as a "strategic competitor," a phrase he used often during the presidential campaign.
James Steinberg, the deputy national security adviser under Mr. Clinton, said, "You'll never hear the words strategic competitor again".
Mr Bush has rejected the term; instead, he describes China as a "strategic competitor".More aggressive attitudesThe president has yet to spell out precisely what that phrase means.
After asking the secretary the meaning of the phrase "strategic competitor," he accepted a bland answer without protest, the official said.
Similar(27)
I've heard the last administration talk about strategic partners, and then I've heard others say strategic competitors.
The mixed, complex character of Sino-American relations resists reduction to any simplistic slogan, whether "strategic partners" or "strategic competitors".
However, the question of whether or not China and the US are strategic competitors or potential allies remains unanswered.
But, even before the Russian incursion into Georgia, McCain described the missile-defense systems as "a hedge against potential threats from possible strategic competitors, like Russia and China".
Mr Aiyar proclaims that, from now on, the two countries will see each other less as strategic competitors than as strategic partners.In this section Do we have a story for you!
Related(20)
strategic bidder
strategic enemy
key competitor
strategic adversary
strategic rivalry
strategic rival
corporate competitor
strategic contest
strategic race
strategic swimmer
crucial competitor
strategic player
strategic allocation
strategic depth
strategic breathing
strategic decision
strategic genius
strategic selfie
strategic error
strategic move
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com