strain in common

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "strain in common" is not a standard expression in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing shared challenges or pressures among individuals or groups, but it is not commonly recognized. Example: "Despite our differences, we all feel a strain in common as we navigate these difficult times."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

On average, two people will have only 30% of their bacterial strains in common.

Forbes

For example, our failure to find a robust breakdown of Alexandrium strains in common with cob barcoding study by Lin and colleagues [35] reflects a well-documented problem with this genus, whose morphology can vary greatly under different environmental conditions [28], [84] [87].

Plosone

Given the strains in the gene expression and trait datasets, we restricted our analysis to 1738 traits that had at least 15 strains in common.

eLife

Together, these results suggest that the total sequence diversity of the yeast global population is poorly sampled by this set of strains in common laboratory use.

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

High average best-match values denote that the two clusters have many strains in common and are of roughly the same size [ 8].

BMC Genomics

The tree agrees well with the geographic origins of the strains and, for the subset of strains in common, is also consistent with a previous study that used WGS (Liti et al. 2009).

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

For the 37 strains in common between Yang et al. 2011b and our data, we compared the genotypes and observed that, on average, 99.5% of informative SNPs in our data had the same call in Yang et al. 2011b, 0.49% were homozygous in either Yang or the present study but heterozygous in the other and 0.01% had a SNP in one data set but not the other (Table S2).

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

To increase the likelihood of tracking genes causing female sterility in strain QM6a, we only focused on those SNVs and DIPs which the two inbred strains had in common and which differentiated these strains from strain QM6a.

Biotechnology for Biofuels

In fact, C3H, the only strain examined in common with the current study and previous work performed by Southern blot looking at specific ERV integrations while demonstrating some common sequences, contrasted in several cases for Pmv, Mpmv and Xmv elements.

BMC Genomics

Molecular typing of M. tuberculosis adds important pieces to the construction of such a transmission puzzle; persons who harbor the same strain of M. tuberculosis are likely to have shared that strain in a common chain of transmission; by contrast, persons who are infected by unique and distinct strains were probably infected by means of a different exposure.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

The strains have in common 3,345 CDS residing in their core genomes; while 547 and 344 CDS were found to be unique in FZB42T and DSM7T, respectively.

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, replace "strain in common" with more established phrases like "shared burden" or "common pressure" to minimize potential misinterpretation.

Common error

Avoid using "strain in common" when you mean to convey a shared challenge or difficulty. Opt for more explicit phrases such as "shared burden" or "common pressure" to ensure your message is accurately understood.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "strain in common" is a noun phrase aiming to describe a shared characteristic, pressure, or lineage. However, Ludwig AI points out that it's not a standard expression. Its infrequent use makes its function less clear compared to more common alternatives.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "strain in common" is not a well-established expression in English, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While it attempts to convey the idea of a shared burden, characteristic, or origin, its uncommon usage may lead to confusion. To ensure clarity, it's best to opt for more recognized alternatives such as "shared pressure", "common burden", or, depending on the intended meaning, phrases like "feature in common" or "shared lineage". Using these alternatives will improve the clarity and impact of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

shared pressure

Focuses specifically on the aspect of shared duress or burden.

common burden

Emphasizes the shared responsibility or difficulty experienced by multiple parties.

mutual challenge

Highlights the aspect of a shared difficulty or obstacle.

shared characteristic

Shifts the focus to a feature or attribute that is jointly possessed.

feature in common

Highlights the common attributes.

element in common

Similar to "feature in common" but slightly more abstract.

shared lineage

Refers to a common ancestry or origin, often in a biological or genetic context.

common ancestry

Stresses the shared historical origins.

aspect in common

Highlights shared aspects.

trait in common

Specifically indicates a shared characteristic or feature.

FAQs

What does the phrase "strain in common" mean?

The phrase "strain in common" is not a standard English expression and could be interpreted in various ways. Depending on the context, it might refer to a "shared burden" or a "common pressure".

How can I use the idea of "shared difficulty" in a sentence?

Instead of using "strain in common", consider phrases like "shared difficulty", "common pressure", or "mutual challenge" for clarity.

What's a more common way to express having a 'shared characteristic'?

Rather than "strain in common", use phrases like "feature in common", "element in common", or "trait in common".

Is "strain in common" grammatically correct?

While not strictly ungrammatical, "strain in common" is not a recognized idiomatic expression and may sound awkward to native English speakers. It is advisable to use clearer alternatives.