stood at

USAGE SUMMARY

"stood at" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe a person or object being in a particular position or place. For example: "The teacher stood at the front of the classroom."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

It stood at 35.

Independent

We stood at a crossroads.

The New York Times

He stood at the microphone.

The New Yorker

He stood at the board.

The New Yorker

He stood at the crosswalk.

The New Yorker

The collar stood at attention.

The New York Times

Miranda stood at third base.

The New York Times - Sports

We stood at the terrace door.

The New Yorker

In December, unemployment stood at 5.5%.

The Economist

His wife stood at his side.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

He stood at armpit height.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing numerical data, use "stood at" to clearly indicate a specific value at a particular point in time, such as "The unemployment rate "stood at" 5.7%."

Common error

Avoid using "stood at" to describe trends or processes that are changing. Instead, use phrases like "increased to", "rose to", or "fluctuated around" to accurately portray movement and change.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "stood at" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase that often indicates a specific position, location, level, or measurement at a particular time. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

24%

Encyclopedias

11%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

8%

Academia

8%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "stood at" is a versatile prepositional phrase that effectively conveys a specific location, position, level, or measurement. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for various contexts. It is commonly used in news and media, as well as in scientific and encyclopedic content, reflecting its ability to impart factual information with clarity. The phrase's neutral to formal register makes it suitable for a wide range of writing scenarios, particularly when precision and accuracy are paramount. When describing numerical data, using "stood at" helps ensure that the information is conveyed in a clear, objective manner.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was positioned at

Replaces "stood" with "was positioned", emphasizing placement or arrangement.

was located at

Substitutes "stood" with "was located", highlighting a specific location or site.

measured

Focuses on the quantitative aspect of a level or amount, removing the spatial connotation.

was equivalent to

Highlights the equivalence of a value or measurement, shifting the focus from physical standing to numerical comparison.

remained at

Emphasizes the continuation of a position or level, adding a sense of stability or lack of change.

reached a level of

Highlights the act of attaining a particular level or value, emphasizing the process of reaching it.

was registered at

Focuses on the act of recording a value or measurement, shifting the emphasis to data collection.

was established at

Highlights the setting or founding of something at a particular level or position.

held steady at

Indicates that a value or position remained constant, emphasizing stability and resistance to change.

peaked at

Highlights the highest point reached, focusing on the maximum value achieved.

FAQs

How can I use "stood at" in a sentence?

Use "stood at" to indicate a specific position, level, or amount at a particular point in time. For example: "The thermometer "stood at" 30 degrees Celsius", or "The soldier "stood at" attention".

What are some alternatives to "stood at" when describing a location?

When describing a location, you can use alternatives like "was located at", "was positioned at", or "was situated at".

When is it appropriate to use "stood at" to describe a numerical value?

It's appropriate to use "stood at" when you want to specify a numerical value at a particular moment. For example, "The company's revenue "stood at" $1 million at the end of the quarter".

Is there a difference between saying "stood at" and "was at"?

While similar, "stood at" often implies a sense of formality or precision, particularly when referring to numerical data or specific positions. "Was at" is a more general term and can be used in a broader range of contexts.