stipulates to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "stipulates to" is not commonly used in written English and may be considered awkward or incorrect in some contexts.
It can be used when referring to a formal agreement or condition that is being specified or required, but it is more common to see "stipulates" used without "to." Example: "The contract stipulates to the terms of payment being due within 30 days."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

The controversy stems from a $1,000 donation Eich made in 2008 in his own name – albeit with Mozilla's name listed alongside it, as US law stipulates – to the Proposition 8 campaign, an amendment to California law which outlawed same-sex marriage.

The Guardian - Tech

This is the move Sellars stipulates to be definitive of the scientific image.

SEP

Let: d be the deterministic cargo transport demand, expressed in quantity units, D be the random cargo transport demand, expressed in quantity units, P be the least probability ship owner stipulates to transport cargo within D, y be the quantity of cargo to be transported.

Journal of Shipping and Trade

Schieffer groks that he's laying the problem of "how" off on Congress, and Obama stipulates to that.

Huffington Post

In other situations, each party may agree to geographic limitations on its use of the mark at issue, which the TTAB will honor if the settlement stipulates to facts which show that no confusion is likely.

Wikipedia

And hopEverything wen't be the one in eight, liknowe.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

I stipulated to the known drawbacks — difficult working conditions, low pay, unappreciative administrations and so forth.

The New York Times

Her manager stipulated to the lady who arranged for the concert that Mlle.

The New Yorker

Defendants also often have good strategic reasons to stipulate to the accuracy of crime lab reports.

The New York Times

I got online — yes, I stipulate to the irony — and goaded Mr. Shirky back into sharing the recipe.

The New York Times

"You cannot deprive the other side the moral force of its evidence simply by stipulating to the facts," he said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity and grammatical correctness, consider using "stipulates" without the preposition "to". For example, instead of "The contract stipulates to these conditions", write "The contract stipulates these conditions".

Common error

Avoid adding "to" after "stipulate" unless it's part of a different phrasal verb. The verb "stipulate" already implies directing or specifying something, making the additional "to" redundant and potentially confusing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "stipulates to" functions as a verb phrase where 'stipulates' is the verb, but the addition of 'to' is often considered redundant. Ludwig AI shows mixed usage, with some instances in credible sources but also indicates potential grammatical issues.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "stipulates to" appears in some sources, Ludwig AI suggests it's not the most grammatically sound choice. It functions to specify conditions or requirements, often in legal or formal contexts. However, due to its questionable correctness, alternatives like "specifies" or "requires" are generally preferred. The phrase's usage is rare, and careful consideration should be given before using it, particularly in formal writing. When aiming for clarity, sticking to "stipulates" without the "to" is often the best approach. According to Ludwig, its usage appears mostly in News & Media and Science contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Stipulates

Uses the base verb without the preposition "to", which is grammatically more standard.

Specifies

Omits "to", resulting in a more direct and commonly accepted construction.

Requires

Similar to "specifies" but implies a stronger sense of necessity or obligation.

Dictates

Implies authority or control in setting the condition.

Mandates

Similar to "requires" and "dictates", suggesting a formal or legal obligation.

Lays down

More informal and idiomatic way to indicate setting out rules or conditions.

Sets out

Indicates a detailed explanation or list of conditions is being provided.

Provides

Focuses on what is supplied or made available under certain conditions.

Designates

Highlights the act of formally choosing or assigning something for a specific purpose.

Establishes

Focuses on the act of setting up or creating a rule, law or agreement.

FAQs

How can I use "stipulates to" in a sentence?

While "stipulates to" can be used, it's often more grammatically sound to use "stipulates" alone. For example, "The contract stipulates the conditions" is clearer than "The contract stipulates to the conditions."

What's a clearer alternative to "stipulates to"?

Consider using alternatives like "specifies", "requires", or "sets out" for improved clarity and grammatical correctness. These alternatives avoid the potentially awkward construction of "stipulates to".

Is it correct to say "stipulates to"?

While some sources use "stipulates to", it is generally considered less grammatically correct than simply using "stipulates". The addition of "to" is often redundant and can make the sentence sound awkward.

What is the difference between "stipulates" and "stipulates to"?

"Stipulates" directly indicates the conditions or requirements being specified. Adding "to" after "stipulates" doesn't add any semantic value and is often seen as grammatically incorrect. Using "stipulates" alone is more concise and widely accepted.