still be without something

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "still be without something" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express a situation where someone continues to lack or not have something despite the passage of time or circumstances. Example: "Even after all these years, I may still be without the answers I seek."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Academia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Still be without Medicare.

Huffington Post

Still be without Social Security.

Huffington Post

You can still be a strong, gorgeous woman without something clinging onto your arm.

WikiHow

But it still is something.

The Washington Post

Can something still be wrong?

Yale University

Something still was not right.

Huffington Post

"Something is still being baked but it will now be baked without the UK expressly in mind," a source said.

The Guardian

But they still could be onto something.

The New York Times

Roman Lob – Standing Still Honesty is something I admire – what are we without truth?

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Still, it was something the Rangers could have done without as they cling to dimming playoff hopes.

The New York Times - Sports

Still, Montgomery was onto something.

Yale University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "still be without something", ensure the context clearly indicates a continuation from a previous state or condition. This emphasizes the ongoing lack.

Common error

Avoid using "still be without something" when referring to a completely new situation where there was no prior expectation of having that 'something'. The phrase implies a continuing absence, not just any absence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "still be without something" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating a state of lacking or absence that persists over time. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Wiki

17%

Academia

16%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "still be without something" is a grammatically correct phrase used to indicate the continuation of a lack or absence. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's usable in English. Although relatively infrequent, it finds use across news, wiki, and academic contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure the context emphasizes the ongoing nature of the absence. Alternatives such as "continue to lack something" or "remain devoid of something" may offer a similar meaning in different contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Still not have something

A more direct and simpler way of expressing the same idea.

Remain without something

Similar to the original, but with a slightly more formal tone.

Still be missing something

Indicates that something is absent or not present.

Continue to lack something

Focuses on the continuation of a state of lacking.

Continue to go without something

Focuses on enduring the absence of something.

Remain devoid of something

Emphasizes a complete absence or lack of something.

Still be wanting something

Indicates a continuing desire for something not possessed.

Continue to be deprived of something

Highlights the sense of being denied or lacking something essential.

Still be absent of something

Highlights that something continue to be absent.

Persevere without something

Focuses on managing to push forward without something.

FAQs

What does "still be without something" mean?

The phrase "still be without something" indicates that a person or entity continues to lack or not possess something, implying this absence has persisted over time.

What can I say instead of "still be without something"?

You can use alternatives like "continue to lack something", "remain devoid of something", or "still not have something" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "still be without something"?

Yes, the phrase "still be without something" is grammatically correct, though it's relatively uncommon in formal writing. It is most suited to contexts where you wish to emphasize the continuation of a lack or absence.

How to use "still be without something" in a sentence?

You can use it to express a continuing lack, for example: "Even after all these efforts, they may "still be without something" essential."