statistically sound

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "statistically sound" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing data, research, or methodologies that are reliable and valid based on statistical principles. Example: "The results of the study are statistically sound, indicating a strong correlation between the variables."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Are those polls statistically sound?

The New York Times

The academy concluded that what it called the "collar adjustment" was statistically sound.

The New York Times

A more thorough analysis is needed to provide a statistically sound report, and we are working on one.

The New York Times

The panel's short answer is that New York's testing program did not meet national standards and was not statistically sound.

The New York Times

No statistically sound effect on births was found after the 1965 power failure in the Northeast.

The New York Times

They determined that they could conduct a statistically sound study if they included 200 of the about 2,000 defibrillator patients in the St . Lukes-Roosevelt Hospital system.

The New York Times

For instance, his approach of examining data at a global level, while statistically sound, tends to mask local environmental trends.

The Economist

Dr. Mills does not flinch, calling the tests "statistically sound" and "in accordance with nationally accepted standards".

The New York Times

Mr. Orszag, and most Americans, take for granted that medical research is objective, statistically sound and supported by solid data.

The New York Times

Unless you're talking about a player like Andre Drummond (a 37.1 percent free throw shooter), it's just not statistically sound.

The New York Times

The findings are statistically sound, having been vetted by the Cambridge University Psychometrics Centre.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing research findings, use "statistically sound" to assure your audience that the analysis adheres to accepted statistical standards and produces dependable results.

Common error

Avoid using "statistically sound" as a blanket endorsement without understanding the limitations of the statistical methods used. Always consider potential biases, sample sizes, and the specific context of the analysis.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "statistically sound" functions as an adjective phrase, typically used to describe data, methodologies, or results that adhere to accepted statistical principles and produce dependable findings. As Ludwig confirms, the expression is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

45%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "statistically sound" is a powerful descriptor, affirming the reliability and validity of data and research. As Ludwig AI confirms, its use is correct and appropriate across various domains, particularly in science, news and media, and formal business settings. When writing, remember that using the phrase assures the audience about the integrity of your statistical methods but also requires a solid understanding of those methods. Be cautious of overstating the significance without considering limitations. Alternatives include "statistically valid" and "scientifically rigorous", depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

statistically valid

Changes 'sound' to 'valid', emphasizing the legitimacy and correctness from a statistical perspective.

statistically reliable

Replaces 'sound' with 'reliable', highlighting the consistency and dependability of the statistical results.

scientifically rigorous

Shifts from a purely statistical focus to a broader scientific standard, emphasizing the thoroughness and accuracy of the methodology.

empirically supported

Focuses on the empirical evidence backing the statistical findings, emphasizing that the results are based on observation and experimentation.

methodologically robust

Emphasizes the strength and resilience of the methods used to obtain the statistical results.

statistically significant

Highlights the importance of the findings, indicating that the results are unlikely to have occurred by chance.

well-founded statistically

Changes the structure, emphasizing that the statistical basis is solid and well-established.

data-driven and reliable

Focuses on the source of the statistical analysis and its dependability.

quantitatively substantiated

Emphasizes that the findings are supported by quantitative data and evidence.

evidence-based statistically

Highlights that the statistical analysis is based on solid evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "statistically sound" in a sentence?

You can use "statistically sound" to describe data, research, or methodologies that are reliable and valid based on statistical principles. For example: "The research methodology employed ensured that the results were "statistically sound"."

What can I say instead of "statistically sound"?

Alternatives include "statistically valid", "statistically reliable", or "scientifically rigorous", depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "statistically sound" or "statistically significant"?

"Statistically sound" refers to the validity and reliability of the statistical methods, while "statistically significant" indicates that the results are unlikely to have occurred by chance. They describe different aspects of statistical analysis.

What's the difference between "statistically sound" and "theoretically sound"?

"Statistically sound" refers to the rigor and validity of statistical methods, whereas "theoretically sound" means that something is based on established and logical principles. A study can be "theoretically sound" but lack "statistically sound" evidence.