start of evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "start of evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when introducing or referencing the beginning portion of evidence in a discussion, argument, or legal context. Example: "The start of evidence presented by the prosecution clearly outlines the timeline of events leading up to the incident."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The fifth explanation (i.e., delayed startup) is that errors delay the start of evidence accumulation on the next trial; for instance, participants might need time after an error to reassess their own performance level and overcome disappointment (Rabbitt & Rodgers, 1977).

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Greater anticipated recovery from ESRD among SLE patients could play a role [ 31], but we found LN-ESRD patients were less likely than other patients to have a permanent access in place at dialysis start, regardless of evidence of recovery of renal function.

BMC Nephrology

In July 2012 the standards committee agreed to seek written evidence from the News International executives pending the start of oral evidence sessions in which the accused would be entitled to be legally represented.

The Guardian

Mr Desmond had made that clear towards the start of his evidence, when he disputed that ethical lines could be drawn.

The Guardian

MI5 had "no inkling" of what was to befall London in the summer of 2005, Witness G agreed in answer to leading questions at the start of his evidence.

The Guardian

For both depictions, the distance from the starting point of evidence accumulation to the bound, termed the 'excursion', determines how much evidence must be accumulated in order to commit to a choice.

eLife

Choice bias was quantified using the DDM where a shift in the starting point of evidence accumulation produces faster choices and a larger proportion of choices for an alternative that is more likely or more valuable.

Brain Structure and Function

Through using the framework it should be quite apparent that, for example, the latest media report of a new gene-disease association is only at the start of the evidence-gathering (Phase 0), and thus deserves little of the precious clinical time available for determining current patient care options.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan said that Japan's economy started to evidence signs of stabilization; he spoke of "inklings" the island-nation's deflation also was levelling off.

Forbes

Once you've started, the piece of evidence that comprehensively proves innocence doesn't exist.

The Guardian - Opinion

While debates about the nature of assessment persist, some form of standard assessment around the start of school provides evidence that services are doing what is expected.

International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "start of evidence" to introduce a sequence of facts, arguments, or data points, setting the stage for further elaboration and analysis.

Common error

Avoid using "start of evidence" when referring to the entirety of evidence. This phrase is best suited for indicating the initial phases or pieces of evidence within a larger body of proof.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "start of evidence" functions as a noun phrase identifying the initial phase or point when evidence begins to be presented, considered, or accumulated. It is typically used to set the stage for further discussion or analysis of the evidence itself. Ludwig AI confirms that "start of evidence" is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "start of evidence" denotes the initial phase when evidence begins to be presented or accumulated. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable. It is generally used across neutral registers to introduce a topic in news reporting and scientific writing. While less frequent overall, its use is precise and effective in framing discussions that revolve around evidence-based reasoning. Consider alternatives like "onset of proof" or "beginning of the proof" for stylistic variation. When writing, remember that the phrase is best suited to introduce a sequence of points, but shouldn't be used to describe the entirety of proof itself. From here on, leverage it to enhance clarity and precision in your communications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

onset of proof

Replaces "start" with "onset" and "evidence" with "proof", slightly emphasizing the initial moment of confirmation.

beginning of the proof

Replaces "start" with "beginning" and adds "the", focusing on the initial stage of confirmation.

commencement of evidence

Replaces "start" with "commencement", indicating a more formal initiation of the evidence.

initial evidence

Uses "initial" as an adjective to describe the evidence itself, shortening the phrase.

early evidence

Similar to "initial evidence", but suggests evidence that appears early in a process.

outset of the proof

Substitutes "start" with "outset", highlighting the very beginning, and "evidence" with "proof".

introduction of evidence

Focuses on the act of presenting the evidence, rather than its mere start.

dawn of evidence

Uses a metaphorical expression, replacing "start" with "dawn" for a more evocative tone.

emergence of evidence

Highlights the point at which evidence begins to become apparent.

launching evidence

Implies the initial presentation or deployment of evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "start of evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "start of evidence" to refer to the point at which evidence begins to emerge or be presented, as in "At the "start of evidence", it was unclear whether the defendant was involved."

What is a more formal alternative to "start of evidence"?

A more formal alternative to "start of evidence" could be "commencement of evidence", which lends a more official tone to the introduction of proof.

When is it appropriate to use "initial evidence" instead of "start of evidence"?

"Initial evidence" is appropriate when you are referring to the very first pieces of evidence that have emerged, whereas "start of evidence" refers more broadly to the beginning phase of presenting or gathering proof.

What's the difference between "beginning of evidence" and "start of evidence"?

The phrases "beginning of evidence" and "start of evidence" are largely interchangeable. "Beginning" may have a slightly broader application, but in most contexts, they convey the same meaning.