standard methods

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "standard methods" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to widely accepted techniques or procedures in a particular field or discipline. Example: "In our research, we employed standard methods to ensure the reliability and validity of our results."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Some differences among standard methods emerge.

Chemical Engineering Science

Immunoblotting was performed using standard methods.

Plosone

We have validated these using standard methods.

Plosone

Genomic DNA was prepared by standard methods.

Plosone

cDNA was synthesized using standard methods.

Plosone

Embryos were obtained by standard methods [49].

Plosone

Cells were harvested using standard methods.

Plosone

Embryos were maintained using standard methods.

Plosone

Genomic DNA was isolated by standard methods.

Plosone

Kinetic analysis was performed by standard methods.

Plosone

Transmembrane recordings were obtained using standard methods.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "standard methods", briefly indicate which specific methods are being employed if the context isn't clear to the intended audience. This ensures clarity and reproducibility.

Common error

Avoid using "standard methods" without providing any context. If you don't specify which "standard methods" you used, your work may be difficult to replicate or understand.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "standard methods" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as the object of a preposition or verb. It refers to techniques or procedures that are widely accepted and commonly used in a particular field. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable form.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "standard methods" is a grammatically correct and frequently used noun phrase, primarily found in scientific contexts. It serves to indicate the use of established and recognized techniques, promoting reliability and comparability. While Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, it is best practice to specify the methods being referred to for clarity and reproducibility. Alternatives include "conventional procedures" and "established techniques", but providing specific details enhances the quality of scientific writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

conventional procedures

Emphasizes adherence to accepted and established practices.

established techniques

Highlights the well-known and recognized nature of the techniques used.

common methodologies

Focuses on the shared and typical approaches within a field.

routine practices

Suggests that these methods are part of regular operations.

typical approaches

Highlights that these approaches are commonplace and expected.

accepted protocols

Focuses on the formal acceptance and validation of these procedures.

prescribed methods

Implies that these methods are officially recommended or required.

recognized techniques

Emphasizes that these techniques are widely acknowledged and respected.

orthodox methods

Suggests adherence to traditional and established practices.

customary procedures

Highlights that these procedures are common and habitual.

FAQs

How do you use "standard methods" in a sentence?

You can use "standard methods" to refer to commonly accepted techniques or procedures, such as: "We prepared the samples using "standard methods"." To be more specific, consider: "We extracted the DNA using "standard methods" described in [reference]".

What are some alternatives to "standard methods"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "conventional procedures", "established techniques", or "routine practices".

When should I specify the "standard methods" I'm using?

Always specify the "standard methods" if there's any ambiguity or if your audience may not be familiar with the specific techniques. Providing context ensures clarity and reproducibility. Also, include a proper reference.

Is it enough to say "standard methods were used" without further explanation?

While it might be acceptable in some contexts, it's generally better to provide at least a brief description or reference to the specific "standard methods" used. This improves the transparency and reliability of your work.