Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

standard for evaluation

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "standard for evaluation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific criterion or benchmark used to assess the quality or performance of something. Example: "The standard for evaluation in this study was based on the accuracy and reliability of the data collected."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This approach has formed the paradigm of scientific medical research, placing RCTs as the gold standard for evaluation of healthcare interventions, contributing to the standardization of healthcare and the development of evidence-based guidelines.

In general, cluster randomized controlled trials should be considered the golden standard for evaluation of ASPs.

Audiometry is the gold standard for evaluation of hearing loss, but large-scale use of the procedure involves operational difficulties.

A review of evaluation literature concerning CDSSs indicates that randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) are the 'gold standard' for evaluation.

CT has evolved as the gold standard for evaluation of head injury, but early CT is not always possible.

Science

Injury

The randomized clinical trial is widely viewed to be the gold standard for evaluation of treatments, diagnostic procedures, or disease screening.

Unlike real ERP data, the simulated data are derived from known source patterns, providing a gold standard for evaluation of the proposed matching methods.

To compare 2-dimensional sonohysterography (2D SHG) vs 3-dimensional sonohysterography (3D SHG) using saline solution infusion, with outpatient hysteroscopy as the gold standard, for evaluation of the uterine cavity in women of reproductive age.

Although arteriography is considered to be the reference standard for evaluation of peripheral arterial disease, the variations in its interpretation often lead to disparities in both diagnosis and in treatment.

Contrast-enhanced MRI is the gold standard for evaluation of metastatic involvement of brain.

Cardiac catheterization is the gold standard for evaluation of coronary vascular abnormalities and for interventional procedures.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "standard for evaluation", ensure the specific criteria or metrics used for assessment are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "standard for evaluation" without specifying what the standard actually is. Always provide context to ensure the evaluation is meaningful and can be replicated.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "standard for evaluation" functions as a noun phrase that typically acts as a predicate nominative or object of a preposition. It identifies the criteria or benchmark used to assess something. Ludwig AI indicates it's a correct phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

99%

News & Media

1%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "standard for evaluation" is a commonly used term, particularly in scientific and academic contexts, to denote the benchmark or criteria used for assessing something. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely accepted. While alternatives like "benchmark for evaluation" or "criterion for evaluation" exist, it's crucial to define the specific criteria being used to ensure clarity and avoid overgeneralization. The phrase's prevalence in scientific literature underscores its importance in objective and precise assessment.

FAQs

How can I use "standard for evaluation" in a sentence?

You can use "standard for evaluation" to indicate the benchmark against which something is being judged, such as, "The randomized controlled trial is widely viewed to be the gold "standard for evaluation" of treatments".

What are some alternatives to "standard for evaluation"?

Alternatives include "benchmark for evaluation", "criterion for evaluation", or "yardstick for evaluation", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct: "standard for evaluation" or "standards for evaluation"?

Both can be correct, depending on whether you are referring to a single standard or multiple standards. Use "standard" when referring to a singular, defined measure and "standards" when referring to multiple criteria.

What's the difference between "standard for evaluation" and "method of evaluation"?

"Standard for evaluation" refers to the criteria used for assessment, while "method of evaluation" refers to the process or technique used to conduct the assessment. The "standard for evaluation" defines what is being looked for, and the method describes how it is being assessed.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: