Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
standard for comparison
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "standard for comparison" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to make a comparison between two or more things using a common measure or criteria. For example, "The new car is a much better standard for comparison than the model it replaced."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(16)
benchmark for comparison
basis for comparison
reference point for comparison
benchmark
criterion for comparison
measure for comparison
frame of reference for comparison
point of comparison
standard for comparing
starting point for reference
foundation for comparison
benchmark for evaluation
yardstick for measurement
standard for evaluation
benchmark for assessment
benchmark for success
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
A better standard for comparison, he said, is cash flow from operations after interest and taxes.
News & Media
Then there was the eggplant Parmesan, which is now my standard for comparison.
News & Media
The civilian murder rate (around 6 per 100,000) is too crude a standard for comparison.
News & Media
PAC cytotoxicity appears somewhat less than RAC, the standard for comparison.
Science & Research
Avogadro and his contemporaries typically used the density of hydrogen gas as the standard for comparison.
Encyclopedias
In each case, the standard for comparison is provided by the budgetary plan.
Encyclopedias
In studies involving patients who have had pneumonia or other severe infections, AZT, rather than a placebo, will be the standard for comparison.
News & Media
The KAHR formalism provides a standard for comparison to similar epoxies and was parametrized using the peak shift method.
Science
Formally, the phrase elemental abundances usually connotes the amounts of the elements in an object expressed relative to one particular element (or isotope of it) selected as the standard for comparison.
Encyclopedias
Hence, pulsed ultrasound disinfection of natural water was thoroughly investigated in this study along with continuous ultrasound as a standard for comparison.
Science
As the gold standard for comparison, two widely accepted endpoints of primary healing within 21 days (SDB) or over 21 days after injury (DDB) were used.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
For clarity, explicitly state the qualities or metrics of the "standard for comparison" you are using, to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "standard for comparison" without clearly specifying what items are being compared. For instance, instead of saying "This is the standard for comparison", specify "This method is the standard for comparison against other diagnostic techniques."
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "standard for comparison" functions as a noun phrase that identifies something serving as a reference point. Ludwig AI shows that is used across multiple contexts, but the function is always about providing a measurable element for evaluation.
Frequent in
Science
60%
News & Media
20%
Encyclopedias
5%
Less common in
Academia
5%
Formal & Business
5%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "standard for comparison" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to denote a benchmark against which other items are evaluated. According to Ludwig, its usage is consistent across various fields, including science, news, and encyclopedias, making it a versatile term in both formal and neutral contexts. To maximize clarity, it's essential to specify what you are comparing and why your chosen standard is relevant. Common alternatives include "benchmark for comparison" and "basis for comparison", each offering a slightly different nuance. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is well-established and useful for objective evaluations.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
benchmark for comparison
Replaces "standard" with "benchmark", implying a high-quality reference point.
basis for comparison
Focuses on the underlying reason or foundation for the comparison.
reference point for comparison
Emphasizes the role of the phrase as a point to refer back to.
criterion for comparison
Highlights the specific criteria used for making the comparison.
yardstick for comparison
Uses a more figurative term, "yardstick", to represent a measure.
measure for comparison
Replaces "standard" with "measure", focusing on the quantitative aspect.
template for comparison
Suggests a pattern or model used in the comparison process.
frame of reference for comparison
Emphasizes the perspective or context within which the comparison is made.
point of comparison
Simplifies the phrase to its most basic elements.
touchstone for comparison
Uses a more literary term, "touchstone", to imply a test of quality or genuineness.
FAQs
How can I use "standard for comparison" in a sentence?
You can use "standard for comparison" to indicate a benchmark against which other things are measured. For example, "In this study, the existing treatment protocol served as the "standard for comparison" for the new therapy".
What are some alternatives to using "standard for comparison"?
Alternatives include phrases like "benchmark for comparison", "basis for comparison", or "reference point for comparison", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.
When should I use "standard for comparison" instead of "benchmark"?
While both terms are similar, "standard" implies a recognized and accepted measure, whereas "benchmark" suggests a high-quality reference point. Choose the term that best fits the specific meaning you want to convey.
Is it necessary to explicitly define the "standard for comparison"?
Yes, clarity is crucial. Always specify what constitutes the ""standard for comparison"" to avoid ambiguity and ensure readers understand the basis of your evaluation.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested