stages of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "stages of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe different phases or steps in a process, development, or progression of something. Example: "The stages of grief include denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Stages of life are artifacts.

The New Yorker

"Early stages of decline, IMHO.

The New York Times

Stages of escalation.

The New York Times

The stages of re-addiction are this.

Independent

Tells about the stages of the eclipse.

The New Yorker

I passed through several stages of emotion.

The New Yorker

Featuring six stages of entertainment.

The New York Times

The stages of Broadway theaters.

The New York Times

Won four stages of the Tour.

The Guardian - Sport

Stages of development are really what counts".

The New York Times

All are in various stages of development.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a linear progression, use "stages of" to clearly delineate each phase of development or process. For example, "the stages of grief" or "the stages of a project".

Common error

Avoid using "stages of" interchangeably with terms that imply simultaneity or overlap. "Aspects of" or "elements of" may be more appropriate when describing components that exist concurrently rather than sequentially.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "stages of" functions as a prepositional phrase often used to introduce a sequence or progression. It is commonly followed by a noun or noun phrase that specifies the subject matter undergoing these stages. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

6%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "stages of" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression to denote a sequence or progression in various contexts. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its versatility extends across diverse fields, from news and media to science and general knowledge. When writing, ensure that "stages of" is used to describe sequential phases rather than simultaneous aspects. Alternatives such as "phases of" or "steps of" may provide nuanced alternatives depending on the specific emphasis needed. The phrase maintains a neutral tone, making it appropriate for both formal and informal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

phases of

This alternative directly replaces "stages" with "phases", indicating different periods or aspects in a process.

steps of

Using "steps" highlights the sequential nature of a process, emphasizing a progression from one action to another.

levels of

This alternative suggests a hierarchical progression, where each level represents a different state or degree.

periods of

Focuses on specific durations or segments within a larger timeframe, highlighting distinct intervals.

progression of

Highlights the advancement or development through a series of changes or events.

sequence of

This emphasizes the order in which events or actions occur, stressing a specific arrangement.

development of

Focuses on the growth or evolution of something through various stages.

process of

Describes a series of actions or steps taken to achieve a particular outcome.

cycle of

Implies a recurring sequence of events or phases that repeat in a circular manner.

course of

Highlights the path or trajectory of something as it advances through different stages.

FAQs

How can I use "stages of" in a sentence?

You can use "stages of" to describe the different phases or steps in a process or development, such as "The "stages of growth"" or "The "stages of development"".

What are some alternatives to "stages of"?

Some alternatives include "phases of", "steps of", or "levels of", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "stage of" instead of "stages of"?

The correctness depends on the context. "Stage of" refers to a single phase or step, while "stages of" refers to multiple phases or steps. For example, "This is one stage of the project" vs. "These are the stages of the project".

What's the difference between "stages of" and "aspects of"?

"Stages of" implies a sequential progression, while "aspects of" refers to different parts or features of something that may exist simultaneously. The choice depends on whether you're describing a process or a set of characteristics.