Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

splitting hairs

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"splitting hairs" is a grammatically correct phrase and is commonly used in written English.
You can use this phrase when you want to refer to nitpicking or quibbling over minor details. For example, "We can debate this issue all day, but we're just splitting hairs at this point."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

That's splitting hairs.

News & Media

The New York Times

"But it's just splitting hairs.

News & Media

The New York Times

But we're not splitting hairs.

But this is splitting hairs.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Scoring felt like splitting hairs".

This may be splitting hairs.

But I'm really splitting hairs.

You're splitting hairs, as it were".

News & Media

The New York Times

But maybe this is splitting hairs.

News & Media

Independent

Opponents say this is splitting hairs.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

"I grew up in Pasadena, which is just splitting hairs.

News & Media

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "splitting hairs" when you want to dismiss an argument or discussion as being overly concerned with trivial differences. It's effective for redirecting focus to more important aspects.

Common error

Avoid using "splitting hairs" to shut down legitimate concerns or constructive criticism. It can be perceived as dismissive and undermine productive dialogue if the details being discussed are actually relevant.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "splitting hairs" is to act as a verb phrase, often used in the present continuous tense (e.g., "is splitting hairs", "are splitting hairs"). It describes an action of focusing on insignificant details, as confirmed by Ludwig's AI.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Formal & Business

1%

Science

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "splitting hairs" is a very common idiomatic expression used to describe the act of focusing excessively on minor, insignificant details. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically correct and frequently used in written English to dismiss arguments or discussions that are overly concerned with trivial differences. The phrase appears most often in News & Media sources, indicating a neutral register. When you want to dismiss trivial details you can use alternative phrases like "nitpicking" or "quibbling", however be careful not to shut down constructive criticism by using this phrase. The advice of this linguistic analysis and examples from Ludwig will help you correctly use the expression.

FAQs

How to use "splitting hairs" in a sentence?

You can use "splitting hairs" to indicate that someone is focusing too much on minor or insignificant details. For example, "We're just "splitting hairs" if we argue about the exact wording of the contract; the main points are clear".

What can I say instead of "splitting hairs"?

You can use alternatives like "nitpicking", "quibbling", or "hair-splitting" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "splitting hairs"?

It's appropriate to use "splitting hairs" when you believe that a discussion has become overly focused on trivial or unimportant details, and that these details are obscuring the main point or issue. This expression is correct when there is focus in small insignificant details.

What's the difference between "splitting hairs" and "being precise"?

"Splitting hairs" implies an unnecessary or excessive focus on minor details, whereas "being precise" suggests a necessary attention to detail for accuracy or clarity. The context decides when it is good "being precise" rather than "splitting hairs".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: