split responsibilities

USAGE SUMMARY

"split responsibilities" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used in a variety of contexts, both professionally and informally. For example: "To ensure the success of this project, we need to split responsibilities between team members."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

There is a sense that the employee or employee candidate will not be as strong a contributor as a man or a woman without children because of split responsibilities between work and family.

The New York Times

In both Renault and Nissan he has split responsibilities between two pairs of executives reporting to him, meaning there is no obvious successor to hold the carmakers' marriage together if he decides to step down when his contract ends next year.

The Economist

After the March announcement, rumors arose later discounted that the two would split responsibilities, with Sharfstein handling drug matters and Hamburg food safety, nutrition, and tobacco.

Science Magazine

"The demands of football nowadays mean you definitely have to split responsibilities". Solskjaer added: "More than 100 years ago, managers used to be the club secretaries as well.

BBC

It is not thought likely that Allison would move to Ferrari as Fry's deputy, so it remains to be seen how the team would split responsibilities should they end up working together.

BBC

We do our best to split responsibilities around the house and with the kids, and my husband is an amazing father and husband!

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

All system interfaces are more difficult to deal with than the items in the system because of the split responsibility inevitable for interfaces.

System Requirements Analysis

The government needs to reverse its decision to split responsibility for making sure food is what it clams to be between the Food Standards Agency and the environment department.

The Guardian

The McDonald's Corporation revamped its top management yesterday and split responsibility for its fast-growing international operations among a team of senior executives.

The New York Times

The announcement of her appointment stated that Ross and Norris would "share the leadership" of the National; but, in a business, split responsibility is generally problematic.

The Guardian

When Brown became prime minister last year, he split responsibility for antisocial behaviour between the Home Office and the Department for Children, Schools and Families.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "split responsibilities", ensure the division is clear and well-defined to avoid confusion or overlap. Clearly outlining each individual's or group's duties fosters accountability and efficiency.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity when you "split responsibilities". Unclear assignments can lead to duplicated efforts, gaps in coverage, and ultimately, project failure. Define the scope of each role concisely.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "split responsibilities" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often used as the object of a verb (e.g., "we need to split responsibilities"). Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. The phrase often describes how tasks or duties are divided among individuals or groups.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

29%

Formal & Business

18%

Less common in

Wiki

12%

Academia

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "split responsibilities" is a grammatically sound and generally accepted expression used to describe the division or distribution of tasks or duties. Ludwig AI confirms that. Its frequency is categorized as uncommon. Predominantly found in News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business contexts, the phrase serves to clarify accountability and role assignments. To maximize effectiveness, ensure clarity in defining the division to prevent confusion. Alternatives include "divide duties" or ""allocate tasks"". Overall, "split responsibilities" offers a straightforward and effective way to communicate the allocation of tasks, though attention to clarity and context is crucial for successful implementation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

divide duties

Focuses on the act of dividing tasks, highlighting the separation aspect.

allocate tasks

Emphasizes the assignment of specific tasks to different individuals or groups.

share duties

Highlights the collaborative aspect of distributing tasks.

distribute workload

Focuses on the even distribution of the amount of work.

assign roles

Emphasizes the assignment of specific positions and their associated duties.

delegate authority

Implies giving others the power to make decisions and take action.

apportion liability

Specifically refers to the distribution of legal or financial responsibility.

devolve powers

Suggests transferring authority from a central body to local entities.

fragment tasks

Emphasizes breaking down larger tasks into smaller, manageable pieces.

delineate roles

Focuses on clearly defining the specific duties and expectations of each role.

FAQs

How can I effectively "split responsibilities" in a team project?

Start by identifying the necessary tasks and skills required. Then, "allocate tasks" based on individual strengths and interests, ensuring everyone understands their role and how it contributes to the overall goal.

What are some potential downsides of "splitting responsibilities"?

If not managed correctly, "split responsibility" can lead to confusion, lack of accountability, and duplicated efforts. Clear communication and defined roles are crucial to mitigate these risks.

Is it better to "split responsibilities" or have one person in charge?

It depends on the complexity of the task and the skills of the team. For complex projects requiring diverse expertise, "dividing duties" can be more effective. However, for simpler tasks, having a single point of contact may be more efficient.

What's the difference between "split responsibilities" and "delegate authority"?

"Split responsibilities" refers to dividing tasks or duties among multiple people. "Delegate authority" involves giving someone the power to make decisions and take actions on your behalf. While related, delegation implies a hierarchical relationship, whereas splitting responsibilities may involve a more horizontal distribution of tasks.