split by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "split by" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe a division or separation of two or more entities. For example, "The city was split by the river that ran through the middle of it."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

The Liberal Democrats are split by it.

The Economist

It's also split by gender.

The Guardian

The town is split by the River Kennet.

Independent

Its stone pathways are split by asphalt.

The New York Times

Explore how Democratic votes were split by race and gender.

The New York Times

The $1 million prize will be split by the players.

The New York Times

The results are even split by gender and age.

The Guardian

The large flat was split by an exposed bar.

The New York Times - Sports

The Zetas, too, are said to be split by factionalism.

The New York Times

Igraa's own family has been split by the Islamist trend.

The New York Times

To begin with, it is split by race.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "split by", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being divided and the factor causing the division. This will improve clarity and prevent ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "split by" when you mean to describe the components after the split. Instead, focus on describing the division itself. For instance, say "The group was split by disagreement" rather than describing the resulting subgroups immediately.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "split by" functions as a prepositional phrase, indicating the criterion or method used to divide or separate something. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is considered correct for usage in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

35%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "split by" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to denote division or separation based on a specific criterion. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically sound and widely applicable across diverse contexts. It’s commonly found in "News & Media" and "Science", indicating its utility in both descriptive reporting and analytical contexts. The phrase serves to clarify how something is being divided, as highlighted in numerous examples. For enhanced writing precision, it's best practice to explicitly state both the divided entity and the basis of division. While alternatives like "divided by" or "separated by" exist, "split by" often suggests a more distinct or abrupt separation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

divided according to

Focuses on the act of dividing based on a specific criterion.

separated by means of

Highlights the method used to create the separation.

partitioned in relation to

Emphasizes a structured division with respect to something.

differentiated on the basis of

Focuses on highlighting differences to distinguish between elements.

categorized according to

Stresses organization into distinct groups based on shared attributes.

segmented with respect to

Highlights the process of dividing into specific segments.

demarcated by virtue of

Indicates a clear boundary or distinction due to a particular quality.

sectioned in accordance with

Implies division into sections following a set standard or rule.

classed under

Focuses on assigning to a class or type.

grouped according to

Stresses the organization into groups according to certain criteria.

FAQs

How can I use "split by" in a sentence?

The phrase "split by" is used to indicate a division or separation based on a specific criterion. For example, "The team was "split by" age groups" or "The town is "split by" a river".

What are some alternatives to "split by"?

Alternatives include phrases like "divided by", "separated by", "partitioned by", or "categorized by", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "split by" or "divided by"?

Both ""split by"" and "divided by" are grammatically correct and can often be used interchangeably. However, "split by" might imply a more physical or abrupt separation, while "divided by" can be more general.

What's the difference between "split by" and "influenced by"?

"Split by" indicates a separation or division, whereas "influenced by" suggests that something is affected or changed by something else. They have distinct meanings and are not interchangeable.