spillovers

USAGE SUMMARY

"spillovers" is a correct and usable word in written English.
You can use it to refer to secondary effects or results that are caused by something else. For example, "The economic recession has had far-reaching spillovers, affecting companies across multiple industries."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"With a portfolio of €4.4tn euros in European Union's assets, and high and rising interconnectedness with the wider financial system, these insurers create a source of potential spillovers.

The Guardian - Money

To limit such spillovers and save taxpayers having to bail banks out of their foreign misadventures, regulators around the world are seeking to ring-fence their banking systems.The case for integrationBefore the crisis, the logic of financial globalisation seemed impeccable.

The Economist

It is tempting, if social capital is defined in terms of community or trust, to see such spillovers as always positive.

The Economist

The company now sells 1m Indian-made tyres a year in Europe.In contrast, the purchase in 2008 of Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) by Tata Motors, another Indian firm, has resulted in few spillovers for the parent's operations.

The Economist

Then there is another kind of skilled worker who enjoys those benefits of agglomeration but also the externality-oriented benefits: things like knowledge spillovers in specialised industries or Jacobs externalities, in which urban diversity breeds serendipitous opportunities.

The Economist

The point is that this is not a zero sum game; QE raises a country's GDP by more than any improvement in the trade balance.There are other spillovers.

The Economist

It cannot count as a success if global consumption of illicit substances is going up, not down.Worse, the spillovers can be grave.

The Economist

Synchronised declines have tended not to be the result of spillovers from America, but to have global causes.

The Economist

The effects could be quite long-lived if the labour-saving innovations in question might otherwise have generated knowledge spillovers leading to knock-on discoveries.

The Economist

It is right and proper to take into account potential externalities negative ones, like congestion and changes in neighbourhood aesthetics that harm existing residents, and positive ones, like knowledge spillovers that raise productivity, wages, and metropolitan growth and determine whether government intervention of some sort might not boost overall welfare.

The Economist

Because economists could not measure spillovers or delimit their scope ("How far does a technological spillover spill?" Mr Krugman wondered), they could invoke them to explain just about anything.Mr Krugman's models instead identified a less elusive benefit of proximity.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the impact of events or policies, use "spillovers" to succinctly describe secondary effects that extend beyond the immediate area of impact.

Common error

Avoid using "spillovers" to describe direct or intended consequences. Reserve it for effects that are secondary, indirect, or less obvious results of an action or event.

Linguistic Context

The term "spillovers" functions primarily as a noun, often in the plural form, referring to the secondary or indirect effects of an event, policy, or action. Ludwig AI indicates it is grammatically correct. Examples from Ludwig show it used to describe both positive and negative consequences.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

56%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

24%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "spillovers" is a grammatically sound and frequently used noun that refers to indirect or secondary effects. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a correct and usable term in written English. Predominantly found in News & Media, Formal & Business, and Science contexts, it serves to analyze the broad impacts of events and policies. To enhance clarity, avoid using "spillovers" for direct consequences and consider synonyms like "secondary effects" or "ripple effects" when appropriate. Mastering the nuances of "spillovers" allows for more precise and insightful communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

secondary effects

Focuses specifically on the effects that arise as a consequence of something else.

ripple effects

Implies a cascading series of consequences, like ripples spreading on water.

flow-on effects

Similar to ripple effects, emphasizing the flow of consequences from an initial event.

knock-on effects

Suggests a chain reaction of consequences.

unintended consequences

Highlights that the effects were not originally planned or foreseen.

side effects

Often used in medical or technical contexts, suggesting accompanying but not necessarily intended effects.

byproducts

Emphasizes that the effects are produced incidentally during a process.

externalities

An economics term referring to costs or benefits affecting a party who did not choose to incur that cost or benefit.

consequences

A general term for the results or effects of an action or condition.

ramifications

Suggests complex and far-reaching consequences.

FAQs

How can I use "spillovers" in a sentence?

Use "spillovers" to describe indirect or secondary effects that arise from an action or event. For example, "The new trade agreement had significant economic "spillovers" for neighboring countries."

What are some synonyms for "spillovers"?

Alternatives to "spillovers" include "secondary effects", "ripple effects", or "knock-on effects". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to use "spillovers" to describe positive outcomes?

Yes, "spillovers" can describe both positive and negative secondary effects. For example, "The investment in renewable energy had positive technological "spillovers" for other industries."

What's the difference between "spillovers" and "consequences"?

"Consequences" generally refer to direct results of an action, while "spillovers" are indirect or secondary effects. "Consequences" are often intended or foreseeable, whereas "spillovers" may be unintended or less obvious.