specific errors of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "specific errors of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing particular mistakes or inaccuracies in a certain context, such as writing, analysis, or performance. Example: "The report highlighted specific errors of calculation that affected the final results."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

But, rather than getting into any specific errors of fact, Theranos focussed on the Journal's choice of sources.

The New Yorker

Even when they are methodologically and epistemically conservative, feminist interventions that correct specific errors of omission and extend the tools of science to neglected problems often generate more deeply challenging questions.

SEP

It is virtually certain that reanalysis data, which are produced in an alternative way, do not include the specific errors of the GCM used for the future climate projections.

Environmental Systems Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

We used a Bonferroni correction so that a test specific error of 0.016 0.05/33) was used for significance testing of all primary two way comparisons.

British Medical Journal

In order to evaluate our assembly method and the possible impact of ABySS-specific errors on the annotation accuracy of the long candidate FP sequence, we performed both Trans-ABySS [ 20] and Trinity [ 45] on reads from Fav1.

BMC Genomics

While several studies evaluated the pooling-specific error of former array systems [ 8- 12], error estimated for the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 have not been done so far.

BMC Genomics

The pooling-specific error of the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 in the context of allelotyping studies and the optimal method for correction strongly depend on the study design.

BMC Genomics

Regardless of the intensity correction method applied, the pooling-specific error of the pool intensity values was larger for single pools than for the comparison of the intensity values of two pools, which reflects the scenario of a case control study.

BMC Genomics

The 50/50 case replicates the equivalent condition of the previous experiment: Specific errors constituted 9% of errors, categorical errors 23% (t(11) = 7.5, p < 0.0001).

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

The systems approach focuses on working conditions rather than on errors of individuals, as the likelihood of specific errors increases with unfavourable conditions.

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Despite this stringent cut-off, false positive errors were still detected, mostly as a consequence of the sequence specific error profiles of both sequencers (Table  2, [ 21, 38, 39]).

BMC Genomics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing research findings, be precise by identifying the “specific errors of” methodology or data collection that could impact the results.

Common error

Avoid vague statements. Instead of saying "There were many specific errors of the analysis", detail the exact nature of these errors for clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "specific errors of" functions as a noun phrase modifier, specifying the type of errors being discussed. It is used to highlight the particular nature of the mistakes, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "specific errors of" is grammatically correct and commonly used to denote particular mistakes or inaccuracies in various contexts. As confirmed by Ludwig, it frequently appears in science and news media. Alternatives include "distinct errors in" and "precise inaccuracies of", which can be used to add nuance. When using this phrase, ensure you are providing detailed information to avoid vagueness. While the phrase is generally suitable for neutral to formal registers, context dictates the most appropriate choice. Always aim for clarity and precision when pointing out "specific errors of" any kind.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

distinct errors in

Focuses on the clarity and separateness of the errors.

particular errors within

Emphasizes that the errors are part of a larger context or system.

certain errors among

Highlights that the errors are present within a group or set.

individual errors in

Draws attention to the separate and unique nature of each error.

precise inaccuracies of

Indicates errors are not just wrong, but wrong in a definite, measurable way.

isolated mistakes within

Suggests errors that are not part of a pattern or system.

definite faults in

Implies errors that are clear, obvious, and impossible to deny.

specified defects within

Used when errors are viewed as flaws in a design or construction.

identified fallacies in

Focuses on errors in reasoning or logic.

detailed discrepancies of

Conveys errors in the form of inconsistencies that have been thoroughly examined.

FAQs

How can I use "specific errors of" in a sentence?

Use "specific errors of" to point out particular mistakes in a situation. For instance, "The audit revealed "specific errors of" accounting practices." is more effective than a general critique.

What's an alternative to "specific errors of" that I can use?

Consider using phrases like "distinct errors in", "particular mistakes within", or "precise inaccuracies of" depending on the context and nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to be general or "specific errors of" when providing feedback?

Being "specific errors of" is generally more helpful. For example, instead of saying, "The report had errors", state, "The report contained "specific errors of" calculation on pages 3 and 5".

How does focusing on "specific errors of" improve communication?

By pinpointing "specific errors of", you avoid ambiguity and direct attention to the exact areas needing improvement. This approach is more constructive than providing vague criticism.