sort with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "sort with" is not commonly used in written English and may be considered incorrect in most contexts.
It could be used in informal contexts to imply organizing or categorizing something alongside another item or group, but it is not standard. Example: "I need to sort with the other files before submitting the report."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

"We never have bother of this sort with the French.

The New York Times

Brinkman does little of this sort with her narrator.

The New York Times - Books

Jackson, 46, is a high-energy sort with an abundance of self-confidence.

The New York Times - Sports

Microsoft will face a pricing issue of a different sort with Surface.

The New York Times

But in conversation Mr. Jefferies, 35, is an affable sort with an easy laugh.

The New York Times - Arts

Over time the hostage developed relationships, of a sort, with his captors.

The New York Times

But he did achieve immortality of a sort with On the Road.

The Guardian - Books

Senator Lieberman has appeared in the sort with necklines high up to the collarbone.

The New York Times

"I probably would have a contract of some sort with the Jets," Johnson replied.

The New York Times - Sports

The book combines wooliness of the "What Color Is Your Parachute?" sort with genuinely practical advice.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

She is obsessed with violence of a medieval sort-with armor and the color of blood and rigid headpieces and battles.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider replacing "sort with" with more grammatically standard alternatives like "categorize with" or "classify along with" for clearer communication.

Common error

Avoid using "sort with" when you intend to convey the idea of arranging items into categories. Instead, use "sort by" or "sort according to" to indicate the criteria for sorting.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "sort with" functions primarily as a verb phrase, attempting to describe an action of organizing or categorizing something in relation to something else. Ludwig examples show its use in various contexts, though it's not always grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

35%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "sort with" appears frequently in various sources, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect and non-standard. Ludwig AI indicates its questionable status. More precise and accepted alternatives such as "categorize with", "classify with", or "arrange alongside" are recommended for clearer and more effective communication. When writing, be mindful of using more accurate expressions such as "sort by" or "sort through" to convey the intended meaning without ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

categorize along with

Stresses the process of categorizing items based on shared characteristics.

classify together with

Highlights the act of classifying items into the same category.

associate with

Emphasizes a connection or relationship between items.

arrange alongside

Emphasizes physical arrangement and proximity rather than categorization.

group in conjunction with

Focuses on grouping items that are related or used together.

order together with

Implies placing items in a specific sequence or arrangement.

align with

Suggests placing things in a line or bringing them into agreement.

integrate with

Focuses on incorporating items into a larger system or structure.

combine with

Highlights the act of joining or merging items together.

mix with

Suggests a less structured combination of items.

FAQs

What can I say instead of "sort with"?

You can use alternatives like "categorize with", "classify with", or "arrange alongside" depending on the context.

How to use "sort with" in a sentence?

While "sort with" is not standard, you might use it informally to suggest arranging items together. However, it's generally better to use more precise phrasing like "sort by" or "group with".

Which is correct, "sort with" or "sort by"?

"Sort by" is the standard and grammatically correct phrase when indicating the criteria for sorting. "Sort with" is less common and often considered incorrect.

What's the difference between "sort with" and "sort through"?

"Sort through" means to examine a collection of items to find something specific or to organize them. "Sort with" is less defined, but might informally suggest arranging items together, although it's not a standard usage.