Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
classify with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"classify with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to group items together for comparison or to show that they are of the same type. For example, "We can classify these books with other works in the same genre."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
39 human-written examples
The House measure would correct that by having the national archivist prescribe how and what to classify, with particular emphasis on cutting back categories and ending the pro forma withholding of nonsensitive information requested by the public.
News & Media
The linguistic groups and subgroups of the area are difficult to classify with certitude, but the Grusi languages make up a subbranch of the Gur (Voltaic) branch of the Niger-Congo language family.
Encyclopedias
On the other hand, we classify with SVM.
Thus, the system is not able to classify with a small number of supervised samples.
The results obtained demonstrated that the developed neural network was able to classify with high accuracy the beef samples in the corresponding quality class using their FTIR spectra.
Thus, most existing work in the gait recognition literature detects a CO using the gait feature [5, 17, 35]; however, they only classify with or without a CO.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
21 human-written examples
Finally, the test image is classified with the trained SVM classifier.
Each title and abstract from the test set was classified with each one of these classifiers.
Science
Athletes with visual impairment are also classified with the same sport classes.
News & Media
The Neogregarinida are sometimes classified with the Schizogregarinida.
Encyclopedias
Traditionally, the slime molds have been classified with the fungi.
Encyclopedias
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "classify with", ensure that the criteria for classification are clear and consistent to maintain accuracy and avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using subjective or poorly defined criteria when you "classify with". Rely on objective, measurable characteristics to ensure reliable and reproducible classifications.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "classify with" functions as a verb phrase used to describe the action of assigning something to a particular category or group, often based on shared attributes. Ludwig AI validates this usage as grammatically correct.
Frequent in
Science
70%
News & Media
15%
Encyclopedias
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
2%
Wiki
2%
Reference
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "classify with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to express the act of categorizing or grouping items based on shared attributes. It is used across various domains, particularly in scientific, news, and encyclopedia contexts. The phrase enjoys validation from Ludwig AI, emphasizing its correct usage. To enhance clarity, avoid subjective criteria when classifying, and clearly define characteristics. Alternative phrases such as "categorize along with" can provide nuanced variations in meaning.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
categorize along with
Emphasizes grouping into a shared category.
group together with
Highlights the act of combining items into a single set.
associate with
Focuses on the connection or link between items.
arrange alongside
Suggests a structured placement in relation to other items.
include among
Indicates that an item is part of a larger collection.
sort in conjunction with
Implies organizing items based on a mutual relationship.
lump together with
Suggests a broad and possibly less precise categorization.
catalog with
Focuses on a systematic listing and categorization.
index alongside
Implies placing items in a structured reference system together.
compartmentalize within
Suggests items are placed into separate but related sections.
FAQs
How can I use "classify with" in a sentence?
Use "classify with" to group items based on shared characteristics. For example, "We can classify these books with other works in the same genre."
What are some alternatives to "classify with"?
Alternatives include "categorize along with", "group together with", or "associate with", depending on the specific context.
How does "classify with" differ from "categorize as"?
"Classify with" implies grouping items together that share similar characteristics. "Categorize as" refers to assigning something to a specific category.
Is it always appropriate to "classify with" subjective criteria?
It's best to avoid subjective criteria for classification whenever possible. Objective and measurable characteristics lead to more reliable and consistent results. In cases where subjectivity is unavoidable, ensure that the criteria are clearly defined and consistently applied.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested