smallest capacity

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "smallest capacity" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it when you want to say something has the lowest possible capacity or ability. For example: "The smallest capacity storage unit had just enough space to hold all our belongings."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

It is the oldest ballpark in the majors and has the smallest capacity, just 33,991.

The New York Times - Sports

But with only 61,731 grandstand seats, it has the smallest capacity in the series.

The New York Times

The RCA Dome has the smallest capacity of the league's stadiums, 55,506, but the fans sit closer to the field than they do almost anywhere else.

The New York Times - Sports

It has seating, largely temporary, for just 2,500, the smallest capacity of any team's field in either the Football Bowl or Championship Subdivisions.

The New York Times - Sports

They moved into a refurbished gym that holds 2,800, the smallest capacity in their North Central Conference, and finished the season 9-13.

The New York Times - Sports

In the Greek system, of which the smallest capacity unit was the kotyle (16.5 cubic inches; 0.475 pint; 270 cubic cm), the metrētēs equaled 144 kotyle, or 12 khous, or 2 xestes.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

These batteries may hold their charge longer in storage, but they come with smaller capacity.

The New York Times - Tech

So if you stay in a smaller capacity, it's even more difficult.

The Guardian - Sport

A small elevator close to the main elevator was then used, but it had a much smaller capacity.

The New York Times

But the space is small — capacity is 75 — so the vibe can change on a dime.

The New York Times

But quantities would be limited by the small capacity in Panama.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing physical containers, use "smallest capacity" to precisely indicate the one with the least amount it can hold. For abstract contexts, clarify what aspect of "capacity" you are referencing.

Common error

Avoid using "smallest capacity" when describing something that is simply "small" in size. "Smallest capacity" specifically refers to the ability to hold or produce a minimal amount, not just the overall size.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "smallest capacity" functions primarily as a descriptive adjective modifying a noun. As Ludwig AI confirms, it accurately describes something possessing the least ability to contain or produce.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

32%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Formal & Business

3%

Academia

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "smallest capacity" is a grammatically sound phrase used to precisely describe the minimum holding or production ability. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage and common applications. While appearing in varied contexts, from news reports to scientific publications, its usage tends to be neutral to formal, used when accuracy is needed. When choosing alternatives, consider the subtle nuances in meaning to ensure you are conveying the intended message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Lowest volume

Focuses on the physical space occupied rather than the ability to hold or produce.

Limited capability

Highlights the functional restriction implied by the small size.

Minor capability

Focuses on the limited ability to perform a specific action.

Minimum size

Highlights the dimensional aspect instead of the functional aspect.

Tiniest size

Emphasizes diminutiveness, adding a qualitative dimension to the measurement.

Restricted holding

Specifically relates to the act of containing or possessing something, rather than overall capacity.

Least potential

Shifts the emphasis to the inherent ability or capability, rather than the explicit space or production.

Reduced output

Focuses specifically on the quantity produced, diverging from general holding ability.

Negligible quantity

Emphasizes that the amount is so small that it is practically insignificant.

Marginal extent

Implies a degree of insignificance or barely sufficient quantity.

FAQs

How can I use "smallest capacity" in a sentence?

You can use "smallest capacity" to describe containers, venues, or systems. For example, "This venue has the "smallest capacity" of any club in the top 20 clubs in Europe."

What's a good substitute for "smallest capacity"?

Depending on the context, consider alternatives like "lowest volume", "minimum size", or "least potential".

Is it better to say "smallest capacity" or "least capacity"?

"Smallest capacity" and "least capacity" are often interchangeable, but "smallest" implies a more specific, quantifiable measurement. Choose the one that best fits the precision you want to convey.

When should I use "smallest capacity" versus "smaller capacity"?

Use "smallest capacity" when referring to the absolute minimum among a group. Use "smaller capacity" when comparing two or more items and indicating one has less capacity than the others, but not necessarily the absolute minimum.