smaller in width

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "smaller in width" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the width of two or more objects or dimensions, indicating that one is less wide than the other. Example: "The new model of the smartphone is smaller in width compared to its predecessor, making it easier to hold."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Wiki

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

(Shorter in length and smaller in width, it apparently allows doctors to be more precise).

The New York Times

The Audiovox is the most compact of the four models, about a half-inch smaller in width and height than the other radios but just as powerful.

The New York Times - Tech

In ROM 784 (Dyoplosaurus) and ROM 1930 (Euoplocephalus), each successive free caudal vertebra is approximately 3% smaller in width than the preceding vertebra.

Plosone

Moreover, the transformed brain images of the Chinese test participants into the U.S. (child and adult) templates were greater in length, and smaller in width and height compared with their original brain images (Table 4), suggesting that the Chinese children's brain may be generally shorter, wider, and taller than the U.S. child and adult templates created from North U.S. populations.

Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

The tighter you pull, the smaller in width your bracelet will be.

WikiHow

Remember, the bottom teeth are smaller in width than the upper teeth and, therefore, need not match the upper teeth.

WikiHow

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

Figure 1c shows the FE-SEM image of the product with reaction time of 30 min, and we find out that when more and more ZnO nanoflakes have formed and self-assembled into clusters, aluminum substrate is partially covered with these clusters and ZnO nanoflakes are very small in width and height.

Nanoscale Research Letters

For instance, the binocular fields of a diurnal raptor (Short-toed Eagle [20]) are small in width (20°) and vertical extent (80°), but they are wider (48°) in a nocturnal raptor (Tawny Owl [23]).

Plosone

To do so, we make use of the fact that the initial perturbation that triggers a wave does not necessarily have to be small in width.

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Take the big bit and fold it over, so the side smallest in width is against the other.

WikiHow

Our general "model" of a scratch is a long thin line which runs along all the image with any orientation and color, but which may also have small variations in width and direction, some little interruptions, but no branches.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing two objects, use "smaller in width" to clearly specify that you are referring to the width dimension, avoiding ambiguity with other dimensions like height or length.

Common error

Avoid using "smaller in width" when you actually mean smaller in circumference or girth. "Width" refers to a linear dimension, while "girth" refers to the measurement around an object.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "smaller in width" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, modifying a noun by indicating a reduction in the width dimension. It's used to describe something that has a lesser width compared to something else. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

Wiki

22%

News & Media

28%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "smaller in width" is a grammatically sound and generally well-received way to indicate that something has less width than something else. According to Ludwig AI, it's considered correct and usable. While perhaps not as common as alternatives like "narrower", it is more precise. It is particularly useful in scientific and technical contexts where specifying the dimension is important. When using "smaller in width", ensure that you are referring to a linear dimension and not, say, the circumference of an object. Although its frequency is classified as uncommon, its presence in reputable sources such as The New York Times, Wikipedia and scientific journals confirms its validity in both general and specialized writing. Be sure to consider other options like "less wide" or "narrower" for stylistic variation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

narrower

Single word replacement that directly indicates a reduced width.

less wide

Direct synonym indicating a reduction in width.

reduced in breadth

Uses a more formal term for width (breadth).

with a decreased width

A more descriptive way of saying smaller width.

thinner

Implies a smaller dimension in the width direction, especially for flat objects.

having a smaller transverse dimension

Technical term referring to width.

of reduced lateral dimension

Focuses on the side-to-side measurement.

compact in width

Emphasizes space-saving due to reduced width.

laterally compressed

Suggests the width has been reduced by compression.

more slender

Implies a graceful narrowness.

FAQs

How can I use "smaller in width" in a sentence?

You can use "smaller in width" to compare the widths of two or more objects, for example: "This new model is "smaller in width" than the previous version."

What is a synonym for "smaller in width"?

A simple synonym for "smaller in width" is "narrower", which directly conveys the idea of reduced width.

Is it correct to say "less wide" instead of "smaller in width"?

Yes, "less wide" is a perfectly acceptable alternative to "smaller in width". Both phrases have the same meaning and are grammatically correct.

What's the difference between "smaller in width" and "thinner"?

"Smaller in width" specifically refers to the width dimension, while "thinner" often implies a smaller dimension perpendicular to the surface of a flat object. "Smaller in width" is more precise when comparing widths.