smaller in size

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "smaller in size" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when referring to objects that have different sizes. For example, you might say, "This toy train is smaller in size than the model train."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The demonstrations were far smaller in size and more violent than organizers expected.

The New York Times

I don't think they'll be smaller in value but they'll be smaller in size.

The Guardian

Although similar festivals are smaller in size and scope, all aim for a similar bonding experience with a unique edge.

The New York Times - Travel

The new Free 'b' bus will be smaller in size, greener and weave through the pedestrianised roads.

The Guardian

"The megadeals of the last years are getting lower in number and smaller in size, but customers are still spending".

The New York Times

It is far smaller in size than other corresponding devices.

Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics

The actual particle might be further smaller in size.

Cancer Nanotechnology

Troughs were smaller in size compared to the dam.

Ecological Processes

The Marketplace Stores are smaller in size than multi-department stores.

Forbes

Low grade heat and waste heat recovery systems for electricity production are usually smaller in size.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Newer generation VADs have lower risk of fatal adverse events and are also smaller in size.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing two or more items, use "smaller in size" to clearly indicate a difference in physical dimensions. Ensure the comparison is explicit: "The blue box is smaller in size than the red one."

Common error

Avoid using "smaller in size" when "smaller" alone suffices. For instance, instead of saying "This phone is smaller in size", simply state "This phone is smaller" unless the context specifically requires emphasizing physical dimensions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "smaller in size" functions as a comparative adjective phrase. It modifies a noun by indicating that it has lesser dimensions than another item. Ludwig's examples show its common usage in scientific and general contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

49%

News & Media

32%

Wiki

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "smaller in size" is a grammatically correct and commonly used comparative adjective phrase that emphasizes a difference in physical dimensions. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and frequent appearance in various contexts, especially in science and news media. While sometimes replaceable with simply "smaller", the inclusion of "in size" adds specificity. Be mindful to use it when a precise comparison of dimensions is needed and avoid redundancy when the context already implies size. Understanding these nuances ensures effective and clear communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reduced in dimension

Focuses on the dimensional aspect of being smaller.

less in magnitude

Emphasizes the degree or extent of smallness.

of diminished scale

Highlights a reduction in overall scale.

compact in form

Suggests a condensed or tightly packed structure.

scaled down

Implies a deliberate reduction in size.

tinier in measurement

Highlights the physical measurement aspect.

more petite

Suggests a delicate or graceful smallness, often used for objects or people.

shrunken in proportions

Focuses on the altered proportions due to the reduction in size.

less bulky

Emphasizes the reduced volume or mass.

miniaturized

Suggests a highly reduced, often technologically advanced, smallness.

FAQs

How can I use "smaller in size" in a sentence?

Use "smaller in size" to compare the dimensions of two or more objects. For example: "This model is "smaller in size", making it easier to transport."

What are some alternatives to saying "smaller in size"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "more compact", "scaled down", or simply "smaller".

Is it grammatically correct to say "smaller in size"?

Yes, "smaller in size" is grammatically correct, although sometimes using just "smaller" is more concise. The phrase is used to specifically emphasize the dimension of size.

When should I use "smaller in size" instead of just "smaller"?

Use "smaller in size" when you want to specifically highlight that you are referring to the physical dimensions, especially when other attributes might be relevant. For example: "Although it's the same weight, it's "smaller in size"."