smaller errors for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "smaller errors for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the context of minimizing mistakes or inaccuracies in a particular situation or process. Example: "By implementing this new software, we can expect to see smaller errors for data entry tasks."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

In this way, smaller errors for the initial position of the end-effector and feasibility of the joint angles can be obtained.

Robotics and Autonomous Systems

For cylindrical objects, ITM shows slightly smaller errors for diameters ≥15 mm. Figure 3c shows the DSC which was calculated for the phantom with spherical objects as a comparison of GMRF segmentation vs. ground truth from the CT.

EJNMMI Physics

Further exploration of the data (see Table  2) indicated that participants by and large performed with smaller errors for frontal than for rear wind directions.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

More-detailed inspection of the data (Table  2) indicated that participants performed with smaller errors for frontal than for rear wind directions primarily when confronted with medium wind speeds that is, speeds with an average of 3.9 ± 0.9 knots (for all significant post-hoc comparisons, see Table  2).

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Although the QHM has smaller error for clean signal, it is more sensitive to noise.

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

The approximation of the partition functions leads to a smaller error for the oxygen association reaction, but again, the error associated with the desorption of O2** → O2 has a similar size, 1 2 orders of magnitude, for the temperatures below 400 K and above 700 K.

ACS Catalysis

Comparisons with a three-dimensional finite element analysis demonstrate that the suggested approach yields small errors for the entire range of cases studied.

Composite Structures

Comparison was made with an exact numerical solution, and the results show that the proposed approximation leads to small errors for low reaction rates, and gives a first approximation for the mass transfer rate for very rapid chemical reactions.

Chemical Engineering Science

Zero or small errors for the horizontal modes imply that distributing the lumped-mass mesh over beams constitutes no differences, but for the case of vertical excitation the results show a lot of discrepancies.

International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering

This tendency generally holds for inversion results obtained using the vacuum model (Fig. 11), in which the inversion using station configuration A including data at station VTDK (Table 1) provided the smallest errors for individual parameters among the three station configurations.

Earth, Planets and Space

Computationally, structure 5 b (diastereomer #6 in the computational studies) has the smallest errors for C and H chemical shifts and correspondingly the highest DP4 probability.

Chemistry - A European Journal

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for precision in scientific or technical writing, use "smaller errors for" to specifically indicate a reduction in the magnitude or impact of mistakes, rather than just their frequency.

Common error

Avoid using "smaller errors for" when you actually mean a reduction in the number of errors. "Fewer errors" addresses quantity, while "smaller errors" addresses magnitude.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "smaller errors for" functions as a modifier, specifying a desirable attribute (reduced magnitude of mistakes) in a given situation. Ludwig AI confirms its common usage, primarily within scientific and technical contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

80%

Robotics and Autonomous Systems

10%

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

10%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "smaller errors for" effectively communicates a reduction in the magnitude or impact of mistakes, primarily in technical or scientific domains. Ludwig AI indicates that the expression is grammatically sound and commonly used, signifying a positive change or improvement. When using this phrase, ensure it accurately reflects a reduction in the severity of mistakes rather than simply their number. Alternative phrases like "fewer mistakes in" or "reduced inaccuracies for" may offer greater clarity depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fewer mistakes in

This alternative focuses on reducing the number of mistakes rather than the magnitude of errors.

reduced inaccuracies for

This alternative replaces "errors" with "inaccuracies", providing a slightly more formal tone.

minimized errors in

This alternative uses "minimized" to emphasize the act of reducing errors to the lowest possible level.

decreased error rates for

This alternative focuses on the rate of errors, useful in statistical contexts.

improved accuracy in

This alternative shifts the focus to the positive aspect of accuracy rather than the negative aspect of errors.

enhanced precision for

This alternative emphasizes the fineness of measurement or detail.

lower margin of error for

This alternative is suitable when discussing statistical or experimental results.

less faulty regarding

This emphasizes a reduction in things going wrong or being defective.

reduced deviation in

Highlights the lessening of variance or departure from an established norm.

ameliorated imperfections within

Focuses on the improvement of flawed or imperfect states.

FAQs

How can I use "smaller errors for" in a sentence?

The phrase "smaller errors for" is used to indicate a reduction in the magnitude or impact of errors in a specific context. For example: "The new algorithm resulted in "smaller errors for" predicting stock prices."

What are some alternatives to "smaller errors for"?

Some alternatives to "smaller errors for" include "fewer mistakes in", "reduced inaccuracies for", or "minimized errors in", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "smaller errors" or "fewer errors"?

"Smaller errors" refers to the magnitude or size of the errors, while "fewer errors" refers to the number of errors. Use "smaller errors" when the impact of the errors has been reduced and "fewer errors" when the number of mistakes has decreased.

What does it mean when a method results in "smaller errors for" a specific task?

When a method results in "smaller errors for" a specific task, it means that the inaccuracies or deviations from the correct result are less significant or impactful than with previous methods. This implies an improvement in precision or accuracy.