Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
The adjoining restaurant has tablecloths and a full Italian menu; the slice space has a gorgeous oven, a soda machine and one chair that is nearly always empty.
The adjoining restaurant has tablecloths and a full Italian menu; the slice space has a gorgeous oven, a simple white box that holds the slices, a soda machine and one chair that is nearly always empty.
All the images had the same location, FOV, slice thickness and slice space.
The tubes were then scanned using a 64-row multidetector CT system (LightSpeed VCT, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with the following parameters: tube voltage, 120 kV; tube current, 50 mA; slice thickness, 0.625 mm; slice space, 0; scan field of view, 25 cm; display field of view, 6 cm; matrix, 512 × 512.
DWI parameters included: TR/TE = 6000 ms/65.7 ms, FOV = 24 cm × 24 cm, matrix = 192 × 192, slice thickness = 6.0 mm, slice space = 1.0 mm) with b = 1000 s/mm2 applied in the x, y, and z directions and b = 0 s/mm2 without motion-probing gradients, followed by automatic generation of isotropic DWI.
The mice were scanned using a micro-CT imaging system (eXplore Locus, GE Healthcare, London, Ontario, Canada) set to the following parameters: tube voltage, 80 kV; tube current, 450 μA; exposure time, 400 ms; slice thickness, 45 μm; slice space, 0; scan field of view, 45 mm × 80 mm; effective pixel size, 0.046 mm.
Similar(51)
Twenty cine phases were acquired using retrospective gating with a temporal resolution varying between 25 50 ms. Slice thickness was 8 mm and slice spacing was 2 mm.
b Volume of the liver is obtained based on pixel size and slice spacing [13].
For all other scans, a slice time of 240 s and a slice spacing of 3.125 mm were used.
In-plane spatial resolution ranged from 0.53 to 0.86 mm, and slice spacing ranged from 2 to 3 mm.
Twenty patients were scanned with contrast on Mx8000 CT scanner (Philips Medical Systems), with a 1.3 mm thickness, 1.0 2.0 mm slice spacing and 400 to 900 slices per volume.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com