Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
skin-deep
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "skin-deep" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to describe something that is superficial or only on the surface, often in reference to beauty or character. Example: "Her beauty may be skin-deep, but her kindness and intelligence are what truly matter."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
14 human-written examples
Skin-deep still counts?
News & Media
My interest was skin-deep.
News & Media
Yet changes are mainly skin-deep.
News & Media
It is skin-deep and utterly plausible.
News & Media
Maybe Megan's bravado was always skin-deep.
News & Media
I think politics should be more than skin-deep.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
42 human-written examples
Skin Deep.
News & Media
Skin deep.
News & Media
Is beauty skin deep then?
News & Media
But such things are only skin deep.
News & Media
This taboo is only skin deep.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "skin-deep" to describe qualities or changes that are only superficial and don't affect the core nature of something. For instance, a political reform might be described as "skin-deep" if it doesn't address fundamental issues.
Common error
Avoid limiting "skin-deep" solely to appearance. It can describe superficial changes in systems, ideas, or relationships too. Don't only think about looks; think about depth of meaning.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "skin-deep" primarily functions as an adjective, modifying nouns to describe something as superficial or lacking depth. Ludwig AI confirms its typical usage in describing superficial qualities.
Frequent in
News & Media
70%
Wiki
15%
Science
15%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "skin-deep" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe something superficial or lacking depth. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is frequently used in news and media to critique or downplay the significance of surface-level qualities. When writing, remember that while commonly used to describe physical appearance, it applies to changes, ideas, and relationships too. Alternatives include "superficial", "shallow", and "surface-level". Employ it to add nuance when highlighting the absence of depth or substance. Its frequent use in reliable sources underscores its acceptance and utility in diverse writing contexts.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
superficial
Implies a lack of depth or thoroughness; a general synonym.
shallow
Suggests a lack of intellectual or emotional depth, more negative connotation than "skin-deep".
surface-level
Focuses on the absence of deeper analysis or understanding.
only apparent
Highlights that something seems real but isn't.
cosmetic
Implies an improvement or alteration of appearance only.
on the surface
Indicates that something is not as simple as it seems.
frivolous
Suggests a lack of seriousness or importance.
insubstantial
Implies a lack of significance or solidity.
fleeting
Suggests something that lasts only a short time and is not important.
cursory
Indicates a hasty and not detailed examination.
FAQs
How can I use the phrase "skin-deep" in a sentence?
You can use "skin-deep" to describe something that is superficial or only on the surface. For example, "The changes to the company were only "skin-deep"; the fundamental issues remained."
What are some alternatives to saying "skin-deep"?
Alternatives to "skin-deep" include "superficial", "shallow", or "surface-level". The best choice depends on the specific context.
Is it correct to say something is "only skin-deep"?
Yes, saying something is "only skin-deep" is a correct and common usage. It emphasizes the superficial nature of whatever you are describing.
What does it mean when someone says "beauty is only skin-deep"?
The expression "beauty is only "skin-deep"" means that physical attractiveness is not as important as inner qualities like kindness, intelligence, and character.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested