simply to communicate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "simply to communicate" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express the purpose of an action in a straightforward manner, emphasizing the act of communication itself. Example: "The goal of this meeting is simply to communicate our new policies to the team."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

Simply to communicate a message to Bush?

The Guardian - Opinion

Companies today increasingly understand that it's not enough simply to communicate with people who work for you and tell them it's a great company to work for.

The Guardian

Or perhaps Trump realizes that the job of the White House photographer is not simply to communicate a public-relations message for the President but also to puncture the mystery of the Presidency.

The New Yorker

Our biggest learning was that the responsibility of those involved in branding places is not simply to communicate with people to tell them what a brilliant place it is, but to give them stories which they can relay to their own network of people.

The Guardian

This increase with population size suggests that although VAL schemes maybe designed simply to communicate the hazard, they are being implemented with risk to local populations in mind.

Journal of Applied Volcanology

One way is simply to communicate publicly over the Internet.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

The task for future companies is thus not simply to make things but to communicate in an empathie way that people can relate to, how those things are made.

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

He simply wanted to communicate the tone of the voice, what was happening between the characters.

The Guardian

This diacritical mark, a mere two dots, is simply intended to communicate a particular pronunciation of the vowel it tops.

The New York Times - Food

Their suspicions are understandable; theories like this flourish when people in power behave in conspiratorial or mysterious ways, or simply fail to communicate.

The Guardian

LONDON — St. Valentine's Day, in many places, is a day for the enamored, or simply lustful, to communicate their affections, often anonymously, to the object of their yearnings.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "simply to communicate" when you want to emphasize that the primary or only purpose of an action or event is to convey information or ideas, without other underlying motives or complex objectives. For example, "The purpose of the memo is simply to communicate the updated safety guidelines."

Common error

Avoid using "simply to communicate" when the context implies a more complex or nuanced purpose beyond basic information transfer. Using it in such cases can undermine the credibility or completeness of your message. For instance, if you're aiming to persuade or inspire, other phrases might be more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "simply to communicate" functions as an infinitive of purpose, modifying a verb or clause to indicate the reason or aim behind an action. Ludwig AI indicates that it is correct and usable. For example, "The purpose of this update is simply to communicate the new features."

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "simply to communicate" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase, as indicated by Ludwig AI, employed to express that the primary purpose is to convey information directly and without further agenda. It's particularly useful when clarity and transparency are paramount. While the phrase appears most frequently in news and media contexts, it also finds use in scientific and business communications. When choosing alternatives, consider nuances of expression, such as emphasis on clarity, intention, or effectiveness. Be mindful not to use the phrase when a situation involves more complex motivations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

merely to convey

Replaces "simply" with "merely", emphasizing the straightforwardness of the communication.

just to express

Substitutes "simply to communicate" with "just to express", highlighting the act of expressing something.

only to impart

Replaces the phrase with "only to impart", focusing on the transfer of information.

purely for communication

Changes the structure to emphasize the purpose of communication directly.

solely for the purpose of communication

Expands the phrase to explicitly state the purpose, adding emphasis.

with the sole intention of communicating

Highlights the intention behind the communication, making it more emphatic.

for the single reason of communicating

Emphasizes that communication is the only reason or motive.

in order to get the message across

Focuses on the effectiveness of the communication, ensuring the message is understood.

to plainly communicate

Adds the adverb "plainly" to underscore the clarity and directness of the communication.

just to get in touch

Replaces "communicate" with a more informal expression, implying a basic level of contact.

FAQs

How can I use "simply to communicate" in a sentence?

You can use "simply to communicate" to indicate that the main purpose is to convey information clearly and directly, such as, "The presentation's goal is "simply to communicate" the project's progress".

What are some alternatives to "simply to communicate"?

Some alternatives include "merely to convey", "just to express", or "only to impart". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "simply to communicate" in formal writing?

Yes, it's appropriate. While the phrase is straightforward, it is grammatically correct and can be used in formal writing when the intention is to emphasize the directness and simplicity of the communication.

What's the difference between "simply to communicate" and "in order to communicate"?

"Simply to communicate" emphasizes that the communication is the sole or primary purpose, whereas "in order to communicate" indicates that communication is a necessary step to achieve a broader goal. The former focuses on the act of communicating itself, while the latter frames communication as a means to an end.