simply not true

USAGE SUMMARY

"simply not true" is correct and can be used in written English.
For example: "John claimed that taxes in our state had gone up significantly, but it was simply not true."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

"That's simply not true".

The New York Times

It's simply not true".

The New York Times

This is simply not true.

The New York Times

"It is simply not true".

The New York Times

That is simply not true.

The New York Times - Health

No. #SOTU Simply not true #SOTU.

Independent

"However, this is simply not true.

Independent

"But that belief is simply not true.

The New York Times

But it is simply not true.

Independent

Again, this is simply not true.

The New York Times

"And that's simply not true".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "simply not true", follow it with evidence or a counter-argument to support your claim and provide context for your denial.

Common error

Avoid using "simply not true" without providing any supporting evidence or reasoning. Ensure you have a basis for your claim to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "simply not true" functions as a declarative statement used to directly negate or contradict a previous statement or claim. Ludwig examples show it used in response to allegations, claims, and reports, highlighting its role as a refutation. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Formal & Business

1%

Science

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "simply not true" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase to express direct disagreement or contradiction. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's suitable for both formal and informal contexts, especially in news and media. To maximize its effectiveness, follow it with justifications or rebuttals. While widely accepted, alternatives like "completely untrue" or "patently false" can provide nuance depending on the context. Remember to avoid overuse without supporting evidence. Ludwig's examples showcase this phrase across reputable sources, underscoring its reliable use in expressing clear denials.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

completely untrue

Stresses the total absence of truth.

absolutely false

Reinforces the lack of truth.

categorically untrue

Emphasizes the lack of truth more strongly.

plainly untrue

Implies the falsehood is evident.

patently false

Suggests the falsehood is obvious and easily recognizable.

utterly false

Highlights the complete lack of truth.

demonstrably false

Indicates the falsehood can be proven.

it's a fabrication

Suggests something has been invented or made up.

just not the case

States that something is not a reality.

that's a lie

Directly accuses someone of dishonesty.

FAQs

How can I use "simply not true" in a sentence?

You can use "simply not true" to directly contradict a statement you believe to be false. For instance, "The claim that our company is failing is "simply not true"; our profits have increased this quarter."

What are some alternatives to saying "simply not true"?

Alternatives include "completely untrue", "patently false", or "demonstrably false". The best choice depends on the specific context and the level of formality required.

Is "simply not true" considered formal or informal?

"Simply not true" is generally considered neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts. However, in highly formal or academic settings, more precise or elaborate phrasing might be preferred.

Which is correct, "simply not true" or "it is simply not true"?

Both phrases are correct, but "simply not true" is more concise and direct. "It is "simply not true"" is grammatically complete but can sometimes sound more defensive.