Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

simply a function

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "simply a function" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing something that serves a straightforward or basic purpose without any additional complexity. Example: "In this context, the variable is simply a function that returns the sum of two numbers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Layoffs are simply a function of a reduction in programming.

News & Media

The New York Times

Some deal breakers are simply a function of place.

Part of it may be simply a function of maturation.

News & Media

The New York Times

But what the two aides represent isn't simply a function of velocity or decibel level.

News & Media

The New York Times

Some people think that Strait's trouble on the radio is simply a function of age.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Especially troubling is evidence that this is not simply a function of poverty.

Playing well online is not simply a function of offline charisma.

This stalemate is not simply a function of the current fiscal climate, however.

News & Media

The Guardian

Increasing output is not simply a function of adding new capacity to already existing operations.

And that isn't simply a function of Donald Trump or even our newly partisan times.

That is simply a function of the fact that they too exist within an economy.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "simply a function", ensure the relationship between the cause and effect is clear and direct. Avoid using it for complex or multi-faceted relationships.

Common error

Avoid using "simply a function" when describing complex phenomena with multiple contributing factors. Overusing this phrase can oversimplify intricate relationships and mislead readers.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "simply a function" acts as a predicate nominative, linking a subject to a noun phrase that renames or describes it. As evidenced by Ludwig AI, this construction asserts that a particular outcome or characteristic is a direct and uncomplicated consequence of something else.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Academia

30%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

2%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "simply a function" is a versatile phrase used to express a direct causal relationship between two elements. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage across various contexts, including News & Media, Academia, and Science. While widely applicable, it's important to use it judiciously, avoiding oversimplification in complex scenarios. Remember to maintain clarity and precision when employing this phrase to ensure accurate communication. Consider alternatives such as "merely a result" or "purely a product of" for nuanced expression.

FAQs

How can I use "simply a function" in a sentence?

Use "simply a function" to describe a straightforward relationship where one thing directly results from another. For example, "Layoffs are "simply a function" of a reduction in programming."

What alternatives can I use instead of "simply a function"?

You can use alternatives such as "merely a result", "just a consequence", or "purely a product of" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. These alternatives emphasize the direct causal relationship in a similar way.

Is it appropriate to use "simply a function" in formal writing?

Yes, "simply a function" is appropriate for formal writing, especially in academic and professional contexts, as it clearly and concisely describes a direct relationship or dependency. However, use it judiciously to avoid oversimplification.

What is the difference between "simply a function of" and "complex interaction of"?

"Simply a function of" indicates a direct, uncomplicated relationship, while "complex interaction of" suggests multiple factors are at play. Use the former when the relationship is straightforward and the latter when multiple elements contribute to the outcome.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: