significantly too low

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "significantly too low" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a value or measurement that is much lower than what is expected or acceptable. Example: "The temperature readings from the sensor were significantly too low, indicating a possible malfunction."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

But the new findings related to lakes formed from melted ice and snow indicate that this figure may be significantly too low.

The Guardian

I find that previously proposed such populations, on the order of a few hundred individuals, are significantly too low to consider based on current understanding of vertebrate (including human) genetics and population dynamics.

Acta Astronautica

"It is encouraging that the nation's largest employer, Walmart, has recognized what Republicans in Congress fail to acknowledge: that $7.25 is significantly too low an hourly wage for any American worker," said Drew Hammill, spokesman for House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif .. "We hope that this move will help convince Republicans to stop blocking efforts to raise the wage".

Huffington Post

% hits outside the.04 .06 range should be considered incorrect (i.e., significantly too low or too high).

Behavior Genetics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Resveratrol is found in red wine though in amounts probably too low to significantly affect muscle.

The New York Times - Science

This percentage of foreigners is too low to significantly differentiate them from French respondents.

European Journal of Futures Research

Apparently, the transmissivity of the aquitards is too low to significantly impact the temperature profile.

Geothermal Energy

Moderate resolution remotely sensed imagery (20 30 m) has lacked sufficient spatial resolution to accurately measure total vegetative cover in arid environments because the density of plant cover is generally too low to significantly influence spectral reflectance.

Journal of Arid Environments

Playfair's calculations had raised the density closer towards its modern value, but was still too low and significantly poorer than Cavendish's computation of some years earlier.

Wikipedia

However, this view is not shared by some who argue that the current density outside the barrel is too low to significantly contribute to mass transport.

Analytical Chemistry

This analysis was done on SCS-BTA18-Q cells only, because the number of significantly differentially expressed genes was too low in S. aureus inoculated SCS-BTA18-q cells to perform a reliable investigation of associated molecular and cellular functions.

Genetics, Selection, Evolution

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "significantly too low", ensure the context clearly establishes the expected or required level for comparison. This provides a clear understanding of the degree of deficiency.

Common error

Avoid using "significantly too low" when the difference is only marginal. Overusing 'significantly' can dilute its impact, so reserve it for truly substantial discrepancies.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "significantly too low" functions as an evaluative expression, indicating that a particular value or amount is considerably below an acceptable or expected level. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a valid and usable expression, highlighting a notable deficiency.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "significantly too low" is used to express that a value is considerably below what is expected or acceptable. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and usable in written English. While the phrase isn't overly common, appearing mostly in news and scientific contexts, it effectively highlights a notable deficiency. To ensure clarity, provide context for the expected level and avoid overuse in situations where the difference is marginal. Alternatives include "considerably understated" and "grossly underestimated".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

considerably understated

Emphasizes the degree to which something is presented as less than it actually is.

grossly underestimated

Highlights a substantial error in estimation, suggesting a large discrepancy.

markedly insufficient

Focuses on the inadequacy or deficiency of something to meet a specific need or requirement.

substantially deficient

Indicates a notable lack or shortage in quantity or quality.

far below par

Implies that something fails to meet the expected standard or level of performance.

noticeably inadequate

Draws attention to the obvious insufficiency or unsuitability of something.

well short of the mark

Suggests a significant failure to reach a targeted goal or objective.

nowhere near enough

Emphasizes the vast difference between the actual amount and the required amount.

patently insufficient

Stresses the obvious and undeniable lack of something.

distinctly lacking

Points out the clear absence or deficiency of a particular element or quality.

FAQs

How can I use "significantly too low" in a sentence?

You can use "significantly too low" to describe a value that is much lower than expected. For example: "The estimated budget was "significantly too low" to cover all the project expenses."

What is an alternative to saying "significantly too low"?

Alternatives include "considerably understated", "grossly underestimated", or "markedly insufficient", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always necessary to quantify 'significantly' when using "significantly too low"?

While quantifying isn't always mandatory, providing context for what constitutes "significant" can enhance clarity. For example, instead of saying 'the budget was "significantly too low"', you could say 'the budget was 50% lower than needed'.

When is it inappropriate to use the phrase "significantly too low"?

Avoid using "significantly too low" when the difference is marginal or trivial. Reserve it for situations where the discrepancy is substantial and noteworthy. For example, don't use it to describe minor price differences.