Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
significantly less fluent
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"significantly less fluent" is a correct and usable phrase to use in written English.
You can use it to refer to someone or something's level of fluency or proficiency in a particular activity. For example, "I am significantly less fluent in Spanish than my friend, who has been studying the language for many years."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Although participants reported a more positive experience chatting with the Chinese version of "Michael Lee," they were significantly less fluent, producing 11% fewer words per minute on average, the authors report online today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Science & Research
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
55 human-written examples
To illustrate, a survey of 1,262 patients with type 2 diabetes from the Fremantle diabetes study found residents non-fluent in the English language were significantly less likely to attend diabetes education programs and more likely to demonstrate poorer diabetes knowledge scores than those fluent in English [ 11].
Science
Yes, significantly less.
News & Media
Women still earn significantly less than men.
News & Media
Yes, that's significantly less than 100.
News & Media
The consistent balance is significantly less.
News & Media
A native-speaker could end up being certified by someone less fluent.
News & Media
"I could say that somehow it was less fluent," he told me.
News & Media
In fact, it is giving significantly less.
News & Media
The 1954 adaptation is significantly less terrifying.
News & Media
Facebook and Microsoft both spent significantly less.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "significantly less fluent", ensure the context clearly establishes the area in which fluency is reduced. For example, "He is significantly less fluent in technical jargon compared to his peers."
Common error
Avoid using "significantly less fluent" without specifying the skill or language in question. Saying someone is "significantly less fluent" without context leaves the statement vague and uninformative.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "significantly less fluent" functions as a comparative adjective phrase modifying a noun, typically a person or entity. It describes a state of reduced proficiency in a specific skill, language, or ability. As Ludwig AI states, this phrase indicates a noticeable reduction in fluency.
Frequent in
News & Media
30%
Science
40%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Wiki
10%
Encyclopedias
5%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "significantly less fluent" is a grammatically correct phrase used to express a notable reduction in fluency, whether in language, skill, or expression. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. While relatively rare, it appears in credible sources such as news outlets and scientific publications. When using this phrase, it's important to provide context regarding the specific area of fluency being discussed to avoid vagueness. Alternatives such as "noticeably less proficient" or "markedly less smooth" can offer similar meanings with slight variations in nuance.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
noticeably less proficient
Changes "fluent" to "proficient" and "significantly" to "noticeably", focusing on competence rather than ease of expression.
considerably less articulate
Replaces "fluent" with "articulate", emphasizing the ability to express oneself clearly and effectively, and "significantly" with "considerably".
markedly less smooth
Substitutes "fluent" with "smooth", highlighting the ease and grace of expression, and "significantly" with "markedly".
appreciably less polished
Replaces "fluent" with "polished", focusing on refinement and sophistication in expression, and "significantly" with "appreciably".
substantially less eloquent
Changes "fluent" to "eloquent", emphasizing persuasive and graceful speaking, and "significantly" to "substantially".
distinctly less facile
Replaces "fluent" with "facile", emphasizing ease and quickness in understanding and expressing something, and "significantly" with "distinctly".
visibly less fluid
Substitutes "fluent" with "fluid", focusing on the continuous and effortless flow of expression, and "significantly" with "visibly".
noticeably less well-spoken
Changes "fluent" to "well-spoken", emphasizing the ability to speak in a clear and articulate manner, and "significantly" to "noticeably".
considerably less expressive
Replaces "fluent" with "expressive", highlighting the ability to convey thoughts and feelings effectively, and "significantly" with "considerably".
markedly less proficient at
Changes "fluent" to "proficient at", focusing on the skill in performing something, and "significantly" with "markedly".
FAQs
How can I use "significantly less fluent" in a sentence?
You can use "significantly less fluent" to describe a noticeable decrease in someone's proficiency in a particular skill or language. For example, "After the accident, she became "significantly less fluent" in French".
What's a good alternative to "significantly less fluent"?
Alternatives to "significantly less fluent" include "noticeably less proficient", "considerably less articulate", or "markedly less smooth", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it more appropriate to say "less fluent" or "significantly less fluent"?
"Significantly less fluent" implies a more substantial difference in fluency. "Less fluent" is a more general statement. The choice depends on the degree of difference you want to emphasize.
In what contexts is "significantly less fluent" commonly used?
"Significantly less fluent" can be used in contexts related to language learning, skill development, or recovery from an impairment affecting communication. Examples include describing someone's language abilities after a period of disuse or comparing skill levels between individuals.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested