significant limitations

USAGE SUMMARY

"significant limitations" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to important restrictions or constraints, usually those that restrict your ability to do something. For example, "There are significant limitations on the amount of time we can devote to this project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The 4004 had significant limitations.

Encyclopedia Britannica

But these methods have significant limitations.

The New York Times - Science

However, the approach has some significant limitations.

MIT Technology Review

The proposed regulations carry some significant limitations.

The Washington Post

But it also has significant limitations.

Harvard Business Review

Yet, for all their promise, they have significant limitations.

The New Yorker

I recognize and acknowledge my frailties and significant limitations.

The New York Times - Health

However, these methods have significant limitations.

Bone

Mr. Levy conceded that the simulations do have some significant limitations.

The New York Times

Much comes from afar, like the Meyer lemons, and even jets have significant limitations.

The New York Times - Food

We have read significant limitations into other immigration statutes in order to avoid their constitutional invalidation.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing research, always explicitly state the "significant limitations" to maintain transparency and credibility.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the implications of findings without first addressing the "significant limitations". This prevents misleading interpretations and strengthens your analysis.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "significant limitations" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to qualify another noun (e.g., study, method, approach) by pointing out important restrictions or deficiencies. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

47%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "significant limitations" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It serves to highlight notable constraints or deficiencies in various contexts, particularly within scientific, news, and business domains. When writing, using "significant limitations" demonstrates transparency and critical thinking. Remember to explicitly state the limitations to maintain objectivity and avoid overstating the impact of your findings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

considerable limitations

This alternative emphasizes a notable degree of restriction.

significant weaknesses

This phrase highlights inherent flaws or deficiencies.

notable limitations

This alternative points out limitations that are worth paying attention to.

marked limitations

This option emphasizes the visibility and clear presence of the limitations.

major shortcomings

This stresses the importance and impact of the limitations.

key constraints

This term focuses on the most important limiting factors.

serious restrictions

This expresses gravity and the potentially impactful nature of the limitations.

substantial drawbacks

This indicates disadvantages that are meaningful and considerable.

inherent problems

This phrase focuses on problems that are essentially apart of the context analyzed.

noticeable deficiencies

Highlights that the lack of something is easy to perceive.

FAQs

How can I use "significant limitations" in a sentence?

You can use "significant limitations" to acknowledge the shortcomings of a study, method, or technology. For example, "While effective, the new treatment has "significant limitations" in patients with pre-existing conditions."

What are some alternatives to "significant limitations"?

Alternatives include "considerable limitations", "significant weaknesses", or "notable limitations" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "significant limitations" or "major limitations"?

Both "significant limitations" and "major limitations" are grammatically correct and widely used. The choice depends on the desired emphasis. "Significant limitations" highlights importance, while "major limitations" emphasizes scale.

What's the difference between "limitations" and "shortcomings"?

"Limitations" generally refer to restrictions or constraints, while "shortcomings" implies deficiencies or failures to meet a certain standard. You might say a study has "significant limitations" due to its small sample size or "major shortcomings" due to flawed methodology.