significant inconsistencies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "significant inconsistencies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing notable discrepancies or variations in data, statements, or situations that are important to address. Example: "The report revealed significant inconsistencies in the data collected from different sources, raising questions about its reliability."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

53 human-written examples

For example, there are still significant inconsistencies in state anti-discrimination law.

The Guardian - Opinion

"However," he wrote, "where there are significant inconsistencies related to important facts, they should be considered".

The New York Times

What Justice Cooperman found in the testimony of the 50 prosecution witnesses were myriad significant inconsistencies.

The New York Times

That book later had to be withdrawn from sale after significant inconsistencies were noted and people questioned her account.

The Guardian

Conversely, significant inconsistencies were identified from the Langmuir isotherm for evaluating the fate of Cu+2 at high concentration range.

Measurement

Professor Romano found "significant inconsistencies" in type sizes, spacing, margins and other details between pages 1 and 2.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

7 human-written examples

We found significant inconsistency of the climate change impact on water resources.

Journal of Hydrology

The review revealed a significant inconsistency in mechanical properties claimed in the literature for optical materials.

Materials & Design

This evaluation comparison study supports the findings that the five glare indices have significant inconsistency and inaccuracy issues.

Building and Environment

The most significant inconsistency between Libyan and American accounts is whether the attack that night began with a small protest over the trailer of "The Innocence of Muslims," parts of which were broadcast on Egyptian television.

The New York Times

Audrey Williams, head of discrimination law at the firm Eversheds, said: "To the relief of employers, the ECHR has substantially upheld the approach to religious discrimination law adopted by the UK courts and found no significant inconsistency between UK law and the ECHR.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "significant inconsistencies", ensure you provide specific examples or details to illustrate the discrepancies you are referring to. This adds clarity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "significant inconsistencies" as a general statement without explaining where these inconsistencies lie. Always back up the claim with specific instances to avoid ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "significant inconsistencies" functions as a noun phrase, where "significant" modifies "inconsistencies". According to Ludwig, this phrase is correct and frequently used. It usually points out notable discrepancies or variations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

49%

News & Media

43%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "significant inconsistencies" is a grammatically correct and very common expression used to denote important discrepancies. As Ludwig AI confirms, its primary function is to highlight notable differences or contradictions across various contexts, with a strong presence in scientific and news-related domains. When employing this phrase, ensure you provide specific instances to substantiate your claims, avoiding vague generalizations. Alternatives include phrases like "major discrepancies" or "notable contradictions", which offer nuanced ways to express similar concepts. By understanding its implications and usage, you can effectively communicate the presence of disparities in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

major discrepancies

Focuses on the magnitude of the differences observed.

notable contradictions

Emphasizes the conflicting nature of the inconsistencies.

marked disparities

Highlights the unequal or dissimilar aspects.

considerable variations

Indicates a range of differences that are worth noting.

substantial divergences

Stresses the points at which things separate or differ.

pronounced differences

Highlights the clear and obvious distinctions.

glaring contradictions

Suggests the inconsistencies are easily noticeable and problematic.

evident discrepancies

Focuses on how obvious and easy to spot the inconsistencies are.

palpable inconsistencies

Emphasizes the noticeable and almost tangible nature of the inconsistencies.

acute nonconformities

Highlights the sharp and severe lack of alignment.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "significant inconsistencies" in a sentence?

To effectively use "significant inconsistencies", clearly identify the subjects being compared and specify the nature of the discrepancies. For instance, "The report revealed "significant inconsistencies" between the two datasets regarding patient demographics".

What are some alternatives to "significant inconsistencies" that I can use to diversify my writing?

You can use alternatives like "major discrepancies", "notable contradictions", or "marked disparities" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "significant inconsistencies" or "major inconsistencies"?

Both "significant inconsistencies" and "major inconsistencies" are grammatically correct and widely understood. The choice depends on the specific context; "significant" implies importance or consequence, while "major" emphasizes scale or size. It is recommended to consider also "considerable variations".

What kind of details should follow a statement about "significant inconsistencies"?

After stating that there are "significant inconsistencies", provide specific examples. Mention the exact data points that contradict each other, the magnitude of the differences, and the potential implications of these discrepancies. For example, explain in the numbers or reports details, how these discrepancies occurs.