significant hazards

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "significant hazards" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as safety assessments, risk evaluations, or discussions about potential dangers in various environments. Example: "The report identified several significant hazards that need to be addressed to ensure workplace safety."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

39 human-written examples

Talking pay does not come without significant hazards, however.

The Guardian

His recent work focuses on industries that manage significant hazards, such as nuclear power, petrochemicals, and healthcare.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Most of the others were reclassified as "significant" hazards, which means that dam failure would most likely result in economic loss and environmental damage.

The New York Times - Science

But while companies have sent their managers back on the road, there remain significant hazards on the horizon.

The New York Times

Permanent ground displacement (PGD) caused by surface faulting is considered as one of the most significant hazards affecting buried pipelines.

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

A look back at his previous White House campaigns – and the weaknesses Biden demonstrated as a candidate then – suggests significant hazards he may face, should he move forward this time.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

21 human-written examples

"So this is not a very significant hazard," he said.

The New York Times

But the job-based work structure creates a significant hazard.

Harvard Business Review

According to current figures, 314 of the 371 dams considered a significant hazard now require repair.

The New York Times

"He and Bradford Hill got the data and found there was still a significant hazard".

The Guardian

In another category are 371 dams termed "significant hazard," where failure could lead to property damage.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about "significant hazards", be specific about the nature of the hazard and who or what is at risk. Provide context and detail to ensure clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "significant hazards" as a general catch-all phrase without specifying the exact nature of the danger. Instead, clearly identify the specific risks involved and their potential consequences to ensure your writing is precise and informative.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "significant hazards" primarily functions as a noun phrase that identifies notable dangers or risks. According to Ludwig AI, this is a grammatically correct and widely used phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Academia

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "significant hazards" is a grammatically sound and frequently used term to denote notable dangers or risks across a spectrum of contexts, including science, news, and academia. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is accurate and usable in written English. To enhance clarity, it's advisable to specify the nature of the hazard and the affected parties. Alternatives such as "major risks" or "serious dangers" can be used to add nuance, depending on the intended emphasis. In conclusion, while "significant hazards" is widely accepted, precise language and context are vital for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

major risks

Focuses on the magnitude of the potential negative outcomes.

serious dangers

Emphasizes the severity of the potential harm.

substantial perils

Highlights the imminence and gravity of the threats.

notable threats

Indicates that the risks are worth paying attention to.

considerable risks

Stresses the size or amount of risk involved.

important dangers

Highlights the relevance and impact of the dangers.

critical threats

Emphasizes the urgency and importance of addressing the threats.

grave risks

Draws attention to the potentially deadly or catastrophic consequences.

pronounced hazards

Highlights the readily apparent and noticeable nature of the hazards.

marked dangers

Stresses the clearly evident and easily recognizable nature of the dangers.

FAQs

How can I use "significant hazards" in a sentence?

You can use "significant hazards" to describe potential dangers or risks that are noteworthy. For example, "The construction site presents "significant hazards" to pedestrians."

What are some alternatives to "significant hazards"?

Some alternatives include "major risks", "serious dangers", or "notable threats". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "significant hazards" or "major hazards"?

Both "significant hazards" and "major hazards" are acceptable. "Significant hazards" implies that the hazards are noteworthy or important, while "major hazards" emphasizes the magnitude or impact of the hazards. Choose the term that best fits the specific situation.

What kinds of things can be described as "significant hazards"?

"Significant hazards" can refer to a wide range of potential dangers, including environmental risks, workplace safety issues, health concerns, and security threats. For example, "Poor ventilation poses "significant hazards" to workers' respiratory health."