significant carnage

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "significant carnage" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing large-scale destruction or loss of life, often in relation to war, violence, or disasters. Example: "The battle resulted in significant carnage, leaving the landscape littered with debris and casualties."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

We want significant carnage.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

"The carnage is significant," said Zev Yaroslavsky, a Los Angeles County supervisor.

The New York Times

In recent interviews, the film's director readily acknowledged that movie-goers expect a significant body count; want to see a high level of carnage.

Huffington Post

Among the carnage was the debut of the WB's "Pepper Dennis" (2.92 million), which lost a significant portion of the "Gilmore Girls" audience (4.29 million).

The New York Times

The global outrage in response to the carnage caused by the use of chemical weapons is proof that until they are eradicated, there is a significant risk that one day they will be used, whether by intention or by accident.

Huffington Post

That has put significant pressure on the F.D.I.C. fund, which posted a negative balance for the first time since 1992 when regulators cleaned up the carnage from hundreds of failed thrifts and other commercial lenders.

The New York Times

Carnage ensues.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Absolute carnage!

Independent

And carnage.

The New York Times - Magazine

Carnage indeed.

The New York Times

Then … carnage!

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "significant carnage" when you want to emphasize the substantial and destructive nature of an event involving violence, accidents, or disasters. It's particularly effective in news reports and historical accounts.

Common error

Avoid using "significant carnage" in contexts that are not genuinely destructive or violent. Using it lightly can diminish its impact and appear insensitive.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "significant carnage" functions as a noun phrase where "significant" modifies the noun "carnage". It describes a scene or event characterized by extensive destruction, bloodshed, and loss of life. Ludwig AI examples show its use in reporting on accidents, battles, and violent events.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "significant carnage" is used to describe situations involving extensive destruction and loss of life, primarily found in News & Media contexts. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct. When using this phrase, it's best to reserve it for situations where the scale of destruction is truly significant. Alternatives like "substantial devastation" or "considerable bloodshed" may be more appropriate depending on the specific context and desired emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

substantial devastation

Replaces "carnage" with "devastation", focusing on the destructive impact rather than the violent aspect.

considerable bloodshed

Substitutes "carnage" with "bloodshed", highlighting the violence and loss of life.

extensive destruction

Replaces "carnage" with "destruction", emphasizing the scope and scale of the damage.

major slaughter

Uses "slaughter" instead of "carnage", increasing the intensity of the violence implied.

heavy casualties

Focuses on the number of people killed or injured, rather than the scene of destruction.

widespread decimation

Emphasizes the thoroughness and completeness of the destruction.

severe ruination

Highlights the state of being ruined or destroyed, often used in a more formal context.

notable devastation

Similar to "substantial devastation", but with a slightly different emphasis on being noteworthy.

remarkable destruction

Similar to "notable devastation", but with a slightly different emphasis on being remarkable.

appalling slaughter

Similar to "major slaughter", but with an added element of moral judgment.

FAQs

How can I use "significant carnage" in a sentence?

You can use "significant carnage" to describe events with substantial destruction or loss of life, such as "The battle resulted in "significant carnage", leaving the city in ruins".

What are some alternatives to "significant carnage"?

Alternatives include "substantial devastation", "considerable bloodshed", or "extensive destruction", depending on the specific aspect you want to emphasize.

Is "significant carnage" too dramatic for everyday use?

Yes, "significant carnage" is typically reserved for describing serious events involving violence or destruction. It would be inappropriate for minor incidents or casual conversation.

What is the difference between "significant carnage" and "minor damage"?

"Significant carnage" implies widespread destruction and loss of life, whereas "minor damage" refers to slight harm or impairment. They represent opposite ends of a spectrum of severity.