Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

sided with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"sided with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to someone taking the same position as another person or group on an issue. For example: "The mayor sided with the environmental activists and put in place stricter pollution regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Everyone sided with….

News & Media

The New Yorker

Prussia sided with Russia.

The elders sided with them.

News & Media

The New Yorker

He sided with his wife.

News & Media

The New York Times

Unsurprisingly, Brogan sided with print.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It sided with the buyers.

News & Media

The New York Times

The agency sided with Finra.

News & Media

The New York Times

(Alicia's mother sided with husband).

News & Media

The New York Times

The House sided with Jefferson.

News & Media

The New York Times

Mr Meshal sided with them.

News & Media

The Economist

Residents sided with Mr. Paullin.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "sided with", ensure the context clearly identifies the parties or viewpoints involved. This helps avoid ambiguity and ensures the reader understands who or what was being supported.

Common error

Avoid using "sided with" without clearly specifying who or what the subject is supporting. For example, instead of saying "He sided with them", specify "He sided with the protesters" for clarity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "sided with" functions as a phrasal verb, indicating an act of choosing or expressing support for one person, group, or idea over another. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

80%

Encyclopedias

10%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Science

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "sided with" is a common and grammatically sound phrasal verb used to indicate support or agreement with a particular person, group, or viewpoint. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and usable in written English. As demonstrated by numerous examples from authoritative sources such as The New York Times and The Economist, it's frequently used in news and media contexts. When using "sided with", it's important to clearly identify who or what is being supported to avoid ambiguity. For alternative expressions, consider using "aligned with" or "took the side of" depending on the specific context.

FAQs

How can I use "sided with" in a sentence?

Use "sided with" to indicate support or agreement with a person, group, or idea, like in the sentence, "The jury "sided with" her, though narrowly".

What are some alternatives to "sided with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "aligned with", "took the side of", or "supported".

Is it better to say "sided with" or "took the side of"?

Both "sided with" and "took the side of" are correct, but "sided with" is more concise and commonly used. "Took the side of" might be preferred for emphasis or clarity in certain contexts.

Can "sided with" be used in formal writing?

"Sided with" is suitable for both formal and informal writing. However, in very formal contexts, you might consider "aligned with" or "was in agreement with" for a slightly more sophisticated tone.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: