Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
shrieks of laughter
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"shrieks of laughter" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when someone or something is enjoying something so much that their laugh is very loud and enthusiastic. Example: Everyone around the campfire was in hysterics, their shrieks of laughter echoing across the lake.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
29 human-written examples
Shrieks of laughter.
News & Media
The dressing room was filled with shrieks of laughter and excited chatter.
News & Media
Ms. Kistler's smiles are frequent and often followed by shrieks of laughter.
News & Media
Shrieks of laughter rose from the crowd as he patted his flat stomach.
News & Media
"Ruth works very closely with Jim [Ivory]," says Jaffrey. "They go into shrieks of laughter together".
News & Media
Funny, friendly, she talks in exclamatory speech bubbles, with dizzy shrieks of laughter.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
31 human-written examples
A giggle turns into shriek of laughter.
News & Media
He finished amid a perfect shriek of laughter.
News & Media
You're going to make me wet my pants," Ms. Fletcher said with a shriek of laughter.
News & Media
There might be a single shriek of laughter from a barn — piercing as a bird's cry.
News & Media
Why, it's The Bride from Kill Bill! Moments later, a shriek of laughter is followed by the arrival of three girls, demanding an audience with someone called Charlie.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "shrieks of laughter" to vividly portray a scene filled with intense and unrestrained amusement, adding a layer of emotional depth and realism to your writing.
Common error
While "shrieks of laughter" is perfectly acceptable, avoid overusing it in formal or academic writing where a more subdued description of amusement might be more appropriate.
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "shrieks of laughter" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as an object or complement to describe the sound accompanying intense amusement. As noted by Ludwig AI, it is generally correct for use in English writing.
Frequent in
News & Media
85%
Science
5%
Formal & Business
3%
Less common in
Wiki
3%
Encyclopedias
2%
Reference
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "shrieks of laughter" effectively communicates intense amusement, finding common usage in News & Media. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. When writing, remember that while it's vivid and descriptive, consider the register of your piece, avoiding overuse in formal contexts. For variety, consider alternatives like "peals of laughter" or "gales of laughter" to maintain reader engagement. You're now equipped to use this phrase with confidence and precision.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
peals of laughter
Replaces "shrieks" with "peals", suggesting a more melodic and bell-like quality to the laughter.
gales of laughter
Substitutes "shrieks" with "gales", implying a forceful and unrestrained outburst of laughter.
bursts of laughter
Replaces "shrieks" with "bursts", emphasizing the sudden and explosive nature of the laughter.
uproarious laughter
Uses the adjective "uproarious" to describe the laughter, highlighting its noisy and boisterous quality.
waves of laughter
Emphasizes the continuous and overwhelming nature of the laughter, suggesting it comes in successive bursts.
howls of mirth
Replaces "laughter" with "mirth" and "shrieks" with "howls", suggesting a louder and perhaps slightly wilder form of amusement.
roars of amusement
Substitutes "laughter" with "amusement" and "shrieks" with "roars", emphasizing the loudness and intensity of the reaction.
outbursts of glee
Shifts focus from laughter to general happiness and excitement, using "glee" to convey a similar feeling of intense joy.
explosions of merriment
Replaces "laughter" with "merriment" and "shrieks" with "explosions", highlighting the sudden and joyous nature of the sound.
cries of hilarity
Changes "laughter" to "hilarity" and "shrieks" to "cries", focusing on the extreme amusement and its vocal expression.
FAQs
How can I use "shrieks of laughter" in a sentence?
You can use "shrieks of laughter" to describe a scene where people are laughing loudly and enthusiastically. For instance, "The comedian's jokes were met with "shrieks of laughter" from the audience."
What's a good alternative to "shrieks of laughter"?
Alternatives include "peals of laughter", "gales of laughter", or "bursts of laughter", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
Is "shrieks of laughter" too informal for academic writing?
While generally acceptable, "shrieks of laughter" might be considered too informal for certain academic contexts. Consider using a more neutral phrase like "uproarious laughter" or "loud amusement" in formal papers.
What is the difference between "shrieks of laughter" and "giggles of laughter"?
"Shrieks of laughter" imply a much louder and more unrestrained expression of amusement, whereas "giggles of laughter" suggest a quieter, more subdued, and often nervous or childish form of laughter.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested