should have reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should have reviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to express regret or a missed opportunity regarding a past action that was expected to be completed. Example: "I should have reviewed the report before submitting it to ensure there were no errors."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

The district court should have reviewed the factual basis for the plea, Mr. Martin said.

The New York Times

Alternatively, by early November 2001, when it became clear that the F.B.I. could not complete its clearance investigations in a matter of days or even weeks, the department should have reviewed those cases and kept on the list of Sept. 11 detainees only those for whom it had some basis to suspect a connection to terrorism.

The New York Times

Crist instead said if the Republicans really wanted to examine their past spending with a critical eye then they should have reviewed more than just three years worth of records, since that did not cover the entire time period that Mr. Rubio had a party-issued American Express card.

The New York Times

I should have reviewed this book before, but I didn't.

Vice

Define a minimum number of patient charts that the team should have reviewed before monitoring harms routinely.

BMJ Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

Governor Rell has said that her state should have review power and a veto over the project even though it would be in New York waters.

The New York Times

The court should not have reviewed either Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, or this case, and should not have stopped Florida' s attempt to recount all undervote ballots, by issuing a stay of the Florida Supreme Court' s orders during the period of this review.

The New York Times

The court should not have reviewed either this case or the one it decided last week, they said.

The New York Times

So, should the umpires have reviewed the play?

The New York Times

"This will be a document review to ascertain whether there are documents that were relative to the investigation and that should have been reviewed during the investigation or the prosecution".

The New York Times

Who do you think should have been reviewed instead?

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should have reviewed", ensure the context clearly indicates what action was missed and why it was important. This helps convey the full impact of the oversight.

Common error

Avoid using "should have reviewed" without explaining the consequences of not reviewing. The phrase implies a negative outcome, so clarify what went wrong as a result.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should have reviewed" functions as a modal construction expressing past obligation or advisability that was not fulfilled. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It's used to indicate that a certain action ought to have been done but was not.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "should have reviewed" is a modal verb phrase used to express regret or criticism regarding a past action that was not completed. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its grammatical correctness. This phrase appears frequently in contexts such as News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business settings. Remember to provide clear context regarding the missed action and its consequences for effective communication. Related phrases can offer alternative ways to express similar ideas, but they might carry different nuances.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to have examined

Replaces "should" with "ought to", conveying a sense of moral obligation or advisability.

needed to inspect

Focuses on the necessity of the review rather than the obligation.

was required to assess

Emphasizes the requirement or formal obligation to perform the review.

had to evaluate

Highlights the necessity of evaluating something, implying a lack of action.

failed to check

Directly points out the failure to perform the reviewing action.

missed the chance to scrutinize

Emphasizes the lost opportunity to examine something closely.

did not consider

Focuses on the absence of consideration, which might have included a review.

overlooked the assessment

Highlights that assessment was missed or ignored.

it would have been prudent to check

Expresses that checking or reviewing would have been a wise course of action.

a review would have been advisable

Suggests a review was recommended and needed.

FAQs

How to use "should have reviewed" in a sentence?

Use "should have reviewed" to express regret or criticism about a past action that was not taken. For example, "The manager "should have reviewed" the documents before the meeting to avoid errors."

What can I say instead of "should have reviewed"?

You can use alternatives like "ought to have examined", "needed to inspect", or "was required to assess" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "should have reviewed" or "should of reviewed"?

"Should have reviewed" is the correct form. "Should of reviewed" is a common misspelling that arises from the similar sound of "have" and "of", but it is grammatically incorrect.

What's the difference between "should have reviewed" and "should review"?

"Should have reviewed" refers to a missed action in the past, expressing regret or criticism. "Should review" suggests a recommended action in the present or future. For instance, "They "should have reviewed" the contract yesterday" (past), versus "They "should review" the contract tomorrow" (future).