should have mentioned

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should have mentioned" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that was forgotten or overlooked at the time it should have been mentioned. For example: "I should have mentioned earlier that the event starts at 6pm."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We should have mentioned it.

The New York Times

I should have mentioned that in advance.

The New Yorker

I probably should have mentioned that earlier.

The New Yorker

I should have mentioned that, conceded Tyson.

The Guardian - Opinion

I should have mentioned the Koran.

The New York Times - Magazine

Probably should have mentioned that earlier.

The Guardian - Sport

He says I should have mentioned my talent for anagrams.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

But I think the article should have mentioned it.

The New York Times

I probably should have mentioned that last update.

The Guardian - Sport

Me Someone should have mentioned that to Clapton.

The Guardian - Sport

I think you should have mentioned something like that".

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should have mentioned", consider the audience and context. In formal settings, a more direct apology or explanation might be appropriate.

Common error

Avoid using "should have mentioned" excessively without explaining why the information is relevant or important. Provide the necessary context to make the correction meaningful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should have mentioned" functions as a retrospective modal expression, indicating regret or recognition that something was not previously stated. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Academia

14%

Science

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "should have mentioned" is a versatile phrase used to express regret or acknowledgement of a past omission. Ludwig AI validates its grammatical correctness, and it appears frequently in News & Media and academic contexts. When using this phrase, ensure you provide sufficient context for the omitted information. Consider alternatives like "ought to have mentioned" or "failed to mention" depending on the specific context and desired nuance. The phrase functions to provide additional information and clarification.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to have mentioned

Similar in meaning, but "ought to" implies a moral obligation or expectation that something should have been mentioned.

should have included

Focuses on the act of including something in a list or discussion, rather than specifically mentioning it.

I regret not mentioning

Directly expresses regret about the omission.

it would have been good to mention

More verbose and less direct, but conveys the same idea with a slightly softer tone.

I apologize for not mentioning

Directly expresses apology about the omission.

it would have been wise to mention

Highlights the prudence or advisability of having mentioned something.

failed to mention

Directly points out the omission, without necessarily implying regret or obligation.

neglected to mention

Suggests that the omission was unintentional or due to oversight.

overlooked mentioning

Emphasizes that the act of mentioning was missed unintentionally.

did not bring up

A more informal way of saying something wasn't mentioned, suitable for casual contexts.

FAQs

How can I use "should have mentioned" in a sentence?

Use "should have mentioned" to indicate something you realize you omitted earlier. For example, "I "should have mentioned" that the deadline is next week".

What are some alternatives to "should have mentioned"?

Alternatives include "ought to have mentioned", "should have included", or "failed to mention", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "should have mentioned" grammatically correct?

Yes, "should have mentioned" is grammatically correct. It uses the modal verb "should" with the perfect infinitive "have mentioned" to express regret or acknowledgement of an omission.

What's the difference between "should have mentioned" and "should mention"?

"Should have mentioned" refers to something that you now realize you omitted in the past, while "should mention" indicates something you believe is important to mention now or in the future.