Ai Feedback
The phrase 'should had' is not correct and is not usable in written English.
This phrase is a form of incorrect grammar called a modal auxiliary verb misuse. It is formed by incorrectly combining the modal auxiliary verb 'should' with the past perfect verb 'had'. In written English, you should use the correct phrase 'should have'. For example: "John should have taken the bus instead of driving in the snow."
Exact(17)
Marko Devic's should had clearly crossed the line before John Terry cleared it.
He should had have more respect for his skipper, "a legend of the game who was the last to lead the United States to a Ryder Cup victory on European soil, 21 years ago".
Somehow, the word "should" had been replaced with "shall" in a crucial part of the text, which created the possibility of a legal obligation and a very big problem for the Americans, who may then have had to take the agreement to Congress, where it would be defeated.
In all I should had more than enough room for all my crap.
I thought we were the best side and we should had won the game more comfortably.
"We should had look at life — living things have been around for at least 4 billion years.
Similar(43)
We should have both".
He should have pretended.
"We should have won.
Or should have ended.
Everybody should have insurance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com