Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

should be sufficient for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be sufficient for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something is adequate or enough for a particular purpose or requirement. Example: "The resources provided should be sufficient for completing the project on time."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This standard should be sufficient for getting into the debates.

News & Media

The New York Times

But prestrung heads should be sufficient for most recreational players.

News & Media

The New York Times

A 200 percent bonus should be sufficient for anyone.

News & Media

The New York Times

One hour should be sufficient for a 3- to 3 1/2-pound chicken.

News & Media

The New York Times

This should be sufficient for disposition of the case as to these petitioners.

Figure and caption should be sufficient for the reader to draw a conclusion.

The default value of 128 should be sufficient for most deployments.

Previous studies showed that a single negative feedback structure should be sufficient for robust circadian oscillations.

It is still in preparation (updated frequently), but any recent version should be sufficient for the course.

The methods should be sufficient for someone else to carry out exactly the same experiment or study.

Is the figure static or dynamic? Figure and caption should be sufficient for reader to draw a conclusion.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be sufficient for", ensure the subject and context clearly indicate what is expected to be adequate. Avoid ambiguity by specifying the purpose or requirement.

Common error

Avoid using "should be sufficient for" when there's a high degree of uncertainty or when a stronger assertion of adequacy is needed. Consider alternatives like "will definitely be enough" or "is guaranteed to suffice" for scenarios requiring higher confidence.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be sufficient for" functions as a modal phrase expressing a reasonable expectation or belief that something is adequate or meets a specific requirement. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a standard and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

27%

News & Media

24%

Academia

24%

Less common in

Wiki

15%

Formal & Business

8%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be sufficient for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate that something is expected to be adequate or enough. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its versatility makes it appropriate for various contexts, from academic and scientific writing to news reporting and general communication. While alternatives like "should suffice for" exist, "should be sufficient for" offers a balance of formality and clarity. When using this phrase, ensure that the subject and purpose are clear to avoid ambiguity.

FAQs

How can I use "should be sufficient for" in a sentence?

Use "should be sufficient for" to indicate that something is likely adequate or enough for a specific purpose. For instance, "The budget "should be sufficient for" covering the initial expenses."

What are some alternatives to "should be sufficient for"?

You can use alternatives such as "should suffice for", "ought to be adequate for", or "should be enough for" to convey a similar meaning.

Which is more formal, "should be sufficient for" or "should be enough for"?

"Should be sufficient for" is generally considered slightly more formal than "should be enough for". The choice depends on the context and the desired tone.

What's the difference between "should be sufficient for" and "must be sufficient for"?

"Should be sufficient for" implies an expectation or likelihood of adequacy, while "must be sufficient for" indicates a requirement or necessity. The latter is a stronger assertion.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: